From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
To: Wayne Whitney <whitney@math.berkeley.edu>,
kaos@ocs.com.au, Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: missing symbol do_softirq in net moduels for pre-2
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:04:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01060913041000.01756@oscar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01060911075200.00993@oscar> <16339.992103452@ocs4.ocs-net> <200106091656.f59Gurx10167@adsl-209-76-109-63.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <200106091656.f59Gurx10167@adsl-209-76-109-63.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
On Saturday 09 June 2001 12:56, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org> wrote:
> > > Built -pre2 and noticed most of the modules in net/* are getting
> > > a missing symbol for do_softirq.
> >
> > http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-8
>
> Hmm, I don't think this is it--I'm seeing the same thing, and I have
> tried 'make mrproper'. All symbols are getting versionated except
> certain calls to do_softirq() in, e.g., sunrpc.o and the iptables
> modules.
>
> I looked into this, and I believe the problem is due to 2.4.6-pre2's
> change to the i386 local_bh_enable() macro--the C version has been
> replaced with an assembly language version that does "call
> do_doftirq;". Perhaps this function call from the assembly language
> version does not get versionated?
In my case its off a clean tree patched with lvm, ide patches, dma timeout
retry patch and reiserfs fixes. Did we not have a problem a while back
in ac with versioned symbols in assembly?
Ed Tomlinson
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-09 15:07 missing symbol do_softirq in net moduels for pre-2 Ed Tomlinson
2001-06-09 16:17 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-09 16:56 ` Thomas Langås
2001-06-09 17:04 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-09 17:20 ` Ed Tomlinson
2001-06-09 18:13 ` Wayne Whitney
2001-06-09 18:28 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-09 16:56 ` Wayne Whitney
2001-06-09 17:04 ` Ed Tomlinson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01060913041000.01756@oscar \
--to=tomlins@cam.org \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=whitney@math.berkeley.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.