All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:46:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0107251946010C.00907@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0107251340550.20326-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0107251340550.20326-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>

On Wednesday 25 July 2001 18:41, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 July 2001 08:33, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Now I'm not sure why directly adding swapcache pages to the
> > > inactive dirty lits with 0 zero age improves things.
> >
> > Because it moves the page rapidly down the inactive queue towards
> > the ->writepage instead of leaving it floating around on the active
> > ring waiting to be noticed.  We already know we want to evict that
> > page,
>
> We don't.
>
> The page gets unmapped and added to the swap cache the first
> time it wasn't referenced by the process.
>
> This is before any page aging is done.

True, it's more accurate to say that we already know we want to *try* 
evicting that page.  A wrong guess should not make it all the way down 
the inactive queue.

--
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-25 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0107251802300B.00907@starship>
2001-07-25 16:41 ` [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages Rik van Riel
2001-07-25 17:46   ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-07-26  8:36   ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-26 12:06     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-26 10:38       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-26 12:17         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-26  3:27 Ed Tomlinson
     [not found] <010301c11463$1ee00440$294b82ce@connecttech.com>
2001-07-24 17:07 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 17:42   ` Stuart MacDonald
2001-07-24 17:51     ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 18:09       ` Stuart MacDonald
2001-07-24 18:15       ` Mike Castle
2001-07-24 18:21         ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 17:44   ` Mike Castle
2001-07-24 17:52     ` Rik van Riel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-24  3:47 Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 12:38 ` jlnance
2001-07-24 16:56   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25  0:04     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  0:43     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-07-25  1:30       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 21:18         ` Steve Lord
2001-07-24 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 17:04   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 18:14     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 18:15       ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 20:24   ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-24 20:32     ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 22:16       ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-24 22:25         ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25  0:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25  8:20             ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-25 12:57               ` Martin Devera
2001-07-25 14:16               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 20:33     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25  1:25       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  0:18     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 20:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:05   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 20:53     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:27       ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 23:09       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 19:35         ` Rob Landley
2001-07-25  6:10           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-25  8:32           ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-25 12:53             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 16:05               ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-25 12:57           ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  5:12       ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-25  6:33         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-30 18:09         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:41     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 22:22   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  2:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0107251946010C.00907@starship \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.