From: Marvin Justice <mjustice@austin.rr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and ServerWorks OSB4 Chipset
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:08:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01093016084007.00965@bozo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15nnXL-0007aB-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15nnXL-0007aB-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alright. Until the situation clarifies you might tell RH turn off OSB4 by
default in future releases. It caused us no end of grief with 2.4.3-12.
--
Marvin Justice
Software Developer
BOXX Technologies, Inc.
www.boxxtech.com
512-235-6318 (V)
512-835-0434 (F)
On Sunday 30 September 2001 03:50 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Curious - OSB4 thinks the DMA is still running.
> > OSB4 wait exit
>
> This is an OSB4 trap for a problem I've seen with seagate drivers on some
> boxes. Under very high load with UDMA seagate drives the OSB4 returns to
> us with the chip reporting DMA in progress. The next I/O after this will
> cause disk corruption as it DMA's the last 4 bytes of the previous write,
> then the data shifted up by 4 bytes until the end of that I/O. I need
> to confirm nobody else is seeing this with other working workloads, then
> I'll swap it for a panic - better to die than kill the disc contents.
>
> Serverworks have been looking at the problem but have yet to duplicate it.
> As far as we can tell (and Red Hat have been working with a customer on
> this directly) your choices are
>
> 1. Use multiword DMA not UDMA
> 2. Use non seagate disks with that controller
>
> I am hopeful that serverworks will figure out what is up, but not every box
> sees it - and indeed they've yet to be able to reproduce it.
>
>
> Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-30 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-30 20:37 DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and ServerWorks OSB4 Chipset Marvin Justice
2001-09-30 20:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-30 21:08 ` Marvin Justice [this message]
2001-09-30 21:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-01 15:04 ` Steven Timm
2001-10-01 15:10 ` Mark Hahn
2001-10-01 15:23 ` Steven Timm
2001-10-01 14:59 ` Steven Timm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-12 20:31 DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and Serverworks " Steven Timm
2001-10-12 21:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-27 21:34 DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and ServerWorks " Steven Timm
2001-09-27 22:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 14:53 ` Steven Timm
2001-09-28 15:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-04 15:20 ` Benjamin S. Scarlet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01093016084007.00965@bozo \
--to=mjustice@austin.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.