From: vda <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
To: Ryan Hayle <hackel@walkingfish.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor IDE performance with VIA MVP3
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:12:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01110516120000.00794@nemo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011105005033.A10060@isis.visi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011105005033.A10060@isis.visi.com>
On Monday 05 November 2001 06:50, Ryan Hayle wrote:
> I have a VIA MVP3 (VT82C586B) controller on my motherboard, and am
> experiencing extremely poor performance with a Maxtor 20G
> (52049U4) drive. It is an UDMA66-capable drive, but I'm only attempting
> to use UDMA33 (with an 80-pin cable, as recommended).
>
> The drive is detected and works just fine, with no errors reported,
> however the acces is painfully slow. hdparm -t varries from 970 K/sec to
> 2.5 M/sec. (See below)
Are you saying that hdparm -T -t is yielding wildly varying results?
Looks similar to failing hd symptoms or bug in IDE layer causing retries
after error/timeout. What's in the logs?
> The drive is attached by itself to the first IDE channel. On the second I
> have a Maxtor 6.8G (90680D4) and a CDROM. hdparm -t on the second drive
> typically gives 8-9 M/sec. I manually set this drive with hdparm -X34
> (mdma2), otherwise it generates errors.
>
> I have tried Linux 2.2.19, 2.4.12, and now 2.4.13, and all exhibit this
> same behavior. I was originally running with a 40-pin cable, and switched
> it to the 80 to see if it might help, but it had no effect. As some
> background information, I was originally running linux off of the second
> 6G drive, and opted to move it onto the 20G because it got better
> performance. Once I did this, however, the drive started performing
> slowly like this, regardless of whether I'm booting to it or the 6G
> drive.
>
> Does this sound like it's just a hardware problem? Has anyone experienced
> anything similar to this? Any advice would be greatly apreciated.
Well, I had problems with drives refusing to do [u]dma.
On my home machine I found out that compiling kernel with support for VIA
chipset allowed udma to work ok (hdparm -T -t = ~20mb/s). Without that
support, my hd was stuck in pio, ~6mb/s.
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-05 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-05 6:50 Poor IDE performance with VIA MVP3 Ryan Hayle
2001-11-05 16:12 ` vda [this message]
2001-11-05 17:42 ` Ryan Hayle
2001-11-05 17:55 ` Daniel R. Warner
2001-11-05 19:54 ` Mike Maravillo
2001-11-06 11:50 ` vda
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111051506270.13543-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-11-06 5:21 ` Ryan Hayle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01110516120000.00794@nemo \
--to=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
--cc=hackel@walkingfish.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.