All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vda <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: x bit for dirs: misfeature?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:22:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01111916225301.00817@nemo> (raw)

Everytime I do 'chmod -R a+rX dir' and wonder are there
any executables which I don't want to become world executable,
I think "Whatta hell with this x bit meaning 'can browse'
for dirs?! Who was that clever guy who invented that? Grrrr"

Isn't r sufficient? Can we deprecate x for dirs?
I.e. make it a mirror of r: you set r, you see x set,
you clear r, you see x cleared, set/clear x = nop?

Benefits:
chmod -R go-x dir (ensure there is no executables)
chmod -R a+r dir (make tree world readable)
mount -t vfat -o umask=644 /dev/xxx dir
	(I don't want all files to be flagged as executables there)

These commands will do what I want without (sometimes ugly) tricks.
For mount, I can't even see how to do it with current implementation.

What standards will be broken?
Any real loss of functionality apart from compat issues?
--
vda

             reply	other threads:[~2001-11-19 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-19 16:22 vda [this message]
2001-11-19 14:36 ` x bit for dirs: misfeature? James A Sutherland
2001-11-19 16:58   ` vda
2001-11-19 15:04     ` Tim Waugh
2001-11-19 15:29       ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-19 16:00     ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-19 17:43       ` Kai Henningsen
2001-11-19 18:24       ` vda
2001-11-19 16:44         ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-19 17:24           ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-19 19:39             ` vda
2001-11-19 19:07               ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-20 13:03                 ` vda
2001-11-19 21:01               ` Flavio Stanchina
2001-11-19 19:21           ` vda
2001-11-19 18:14             ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-20 11:20               ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-20 12:01                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-20 15:08                 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-20 17:18                 ` Mike Castle
2001-11-20 17:37                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-20 12:58               ` vda
2001-11-19 16:47     ` Jesse Pollard
2001-11-19 17:15       ` David Ford
2001-11-19 17:37     ` Pascal Schmidt
2001-11-19 18:42     ` J Sloan
2001-11-19 14:46 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-19 17:03   ` vda
2001-11-19 15:07     ` Shaya Potter
2001-11-19 15:12     ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-19 15:19     ` Mathijs Mohlmann
2001-11-19 15:36     ` Gerhard Mack
2001-11-19 16:19     ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-19 22:36     ` Lionel Bouton
2001-11-19 15:12 ` Mathijs Mohlmann
2001-11-19 17:41   ` vda
2001-11-20  0:38 ` Albert D. Cahalan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-20 16:05 Thomas Hood
2001-11-21 10:34 ` Helge Hafting
2001-11-21 23:00   ` Mike Fedyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01111916225301.00817@nemo \
    --to=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.