All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vda <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
To: Mathijs Mohlmann <mathijs@knoware.nl>, Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:12:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01112117122701.02798@nemo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121145237.mathijs@knoware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121145237.mathijs@knoware.nl>

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 13:52, Mathijs Mohlmann wrote:
> On 21-Nov-2001 Jan Hudec wrote:
> >> Go read up on C operator precedence. Unary ++ comes before %, so if we
> >> rewrite the #define to make it more "readable" it would be #define
> >> MODINC(x,y) (x = (x+1) % y)
> >
> > *NO*
> > MODINC(x,y) (x = (x+1) % y)
> > is correct and beaves as expected. Unfortunately:
> > MODINC(x,y) (x = x++ % y)
> > is a nonsence, because the evaluation is something like this
> > x++ returns x
> > x++ % y returns x % y
> > x is assigned the result and it's incremented IN UNDEFINED ORDER!!!
> > AFAIK the ANSI C spec explicitly undefines the order.
>
> in fact, gcc does (according to my tests):
> MODINC(x,y) (x = (x % y) + 1)

drivers/message/i2o/i2o_config.c:#define MODINC(x,y) (x = x++ % y)

Alan, can you clarify what this macro is doing?
What about making it less confusing?
--
vda

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-21 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-21 12:40 [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {} vda
2001-11-21 11:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 11:16 ` Tim Waugh
2001-11-21 12:31 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-11-21 13:40   ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 14:19     ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 14:52       ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 18:23     ` Neil Booth
2001-11-21 12:35 ` Vincent Sweeney
2001-11-21 13:37   ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 13:52     ` Mathijs Mohlmann
2001-11-21 17:12       ` vda [this message]
2001-11-26 20:28         ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27 18:03           ` vda
2001-11-27 18:38             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-28 13:19               ` vda
2001-11-21 14:12     ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-21 14:33       ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-11-21 14:56       ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 14:59       ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 15:48         ` Momchil Velikov
2001-11-21 16:52       ` vda
2001-11-21 14:24     ` Sean Hunter
2001-11-21 14:25   ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-22 20:43   ` Chris Gray
2001-11-22  4:24 ` Stevie O
2001-11-22 11:46   ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-22 12:03     ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-22 20:08   ` J.A. Magallon
     [not found]     ` <01112311540300.00886@manta>
2001-11-23 14:43       ` J.A. Magallon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-27 19:03 Nathan Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01112117122701.02798@nemo \
    --to=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathijs@knoware.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.