From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-parisc-linux@dsl2.external.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Michael S.Zick <mszick@pflash.com>
To: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] ftp://parisc-linux.org/cvs - binutils? - glibc?
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:33:16 -0600
Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
References: <01112712080500.01278@Wolf-01> <20011127182113.D4180@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20011127182113.D4180@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01112712331601.01278@Wolf-01>
Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org
Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org
List-Help: <mailto:parisc-linux-request@lists.parisc-linux.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux>,
	<mailto:parisc-linux-request@lists.parisc-linux.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: parisc-linux developers list <parisc-linux.lists.parisc-linux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux>,
	<mailto:parisc-linux-request@lists.parisc-linux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/>

On Tuesday 27 November 2001 12:21 pm, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>  we have not maintained glibc & binutils cvs trees for a while.
> i suggest the debian packages as your best source of latest bits.

Thanks.

> why you wouldn't simply
> use the upstream cvs binutils, i don't know.

A misunderstanding on my part.
I thought that since gcc was a special, branch version, glibc and binutils 
were also (still) specials.

Thanks again.

Mike