All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rolf Fokkens <fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl>
To: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org
Subject: [PATCH] vanilla 2.4.15 iptables/REDIRECT kernel oops
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:30:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01112822302000.01349@home01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011128165224.5f3dcd8e.skraw@ithnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011128165224.5f3dcd8e.skraw@ithnet.com>

On Wednesday 28 November 2001 07:52, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> The safe patch would look like this:
>
...
>
> Can you check out?
>
I took your patch, and added an obvious change to ip_output.c as well. It's 
below. The patch seems to work fine on my PC, will try tomorrow on the server 
that had the problems initially.

Still don't understand why skb->sk suddenly is NULL after nf_hook_slow. Maybe 
the gurus finally pay attention to this (after all, there's a patch now!!) 
and look into this.

Rolf

diff -ruN linux/include/net/ip.h.orig linux/include/net/ip.h
--- linux/include/net/ip.h.orig  Wed Nov 28 20:40:33 2001
+++ linux/include/net/ip.h       Wed Nov 28 20:47:20 2001
@@ -181,9 +181,9 @@
 static inline
 int ip_dont_fragment(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst)
 {
-        return (sk->protinfo.af_inet.pmtudisc == IP_PMTUDISC_DO ||
-                (sk->protinfo.af_inet.pmtudisc == IP_PMTUDISC_WANT &&
-                !(dst->mxlock&(1<<RTAX_MTU))));
+        return (sk && (sk->protinfo.af_inet.pmtudisc == IP_PMTUDISC_DO ||
+                     (sk->protinfo.af_inet.pmtudisc == IP_PMTUDISC_WANT &&
+                     !(dst->mxlock&(1<<RTAX_MTU)))));
 }
 
 extern void __ip_select_ident(struct iphdr *iph, struct dst_entry *dst);
diff -ruN linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c.orig linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
--- linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c.orig      Wed Nov 28 20:51:02 2001
+++ linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c   Wed Nov 28 20:52:31 2001
@@ -315,7 +315,9 @@
         /* Add an IP checksum. */
         ip_send_check(iph);
 
-        skb->priority = sk->priority;
+        if (sk)
+                skb->priority = sk->priority;
+
         return skb->dst->output(skb);
 
 fragment:

> Can any ip-stack guru comment?
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
> PS: ip_select_ident looks clean in terms of sk==NULL, BTW.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

       reply	other threads:[~2001-11-28 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20011128165224.5f3dcd8e.skraw@ithnet.com>
2001-11-29  6:30 ` Rolf Fokkens [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20011130151342.0ef3f171.skraw@ithnet.com>
2001-12-01  3:33     ` [PATCH] vanilla 2.4.15 iptables/REDIRECT kernel oops Rolf Fokkens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01112822302000.01349@home01 \
    --to=fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.