From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: dinechin@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.0 v3 3/9] tests: q35: MCH: add default SMBASE SMRAM lock test
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:16:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0116dead-489d-e995-8cb5-a90dfdc38ce6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1575899217-333105-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
On 12/09/19 14:46, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> test lockable SMRAM at default SMBASE feature, introduced by
> patch "q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address"
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - a bunch of spelling fixes
> (Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>)
Since I've run git-range-diff for this series anyway, I guess I can help
other reviewers with the changes (relative to the previous, fully
separate posting):
> 2: f1a896f4dbc6 ! 3: 092ec4a30289 tests: q35: MCH: add default SMBASE SMRAM lock test
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> patch "q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address"
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> - Message-Id: <1575479147-6641-3-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
> + Message-Id: <1575899217-333105-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/tests/q35-test.c b/tests/q35-test.c
> --- a/tests/q35-test.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> +
> -+ /* check that writinng junk to 0x9c before before negotiating is ignorred */
> ++ /* check that writing junk to 0x9c before before negotiating is ignored */
> + for (i = 0; i < 0xff; i++) {
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x02);
> +
> -+ /* RAM access should go inot black hole */
> ++ /* RAM access should go into black hole */
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, 0xff);
> + }
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
> + pcidev = qpci_device_find(pcibus, 0);
> + g_assert(pcidev != NULL);
> +
> -+ /* check that RAM accessible */
> ++ /* check that RAM is accessible */
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> +
Thanks,
Laszlo
On 12/09/19 14:46, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> ---
> tests/q35-test.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/q35-test.c b/tests/q35-test.c
> index a68183d..c922d81 100644
> --- a/tests/q35-test.c
> +++ b/tests/q35-test.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,109 @@ static void test_tseg_size(const void *data)
> qtest_quit(qts);
> }
>
> +#define SMBASE 0x30000
> +#define SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN 0x32
> +#define SMRAM_TEST_RESET_PATTERN 0x23
> +
> +static void test_smram_smbase_lock(void)
> +{
> + QPCIBus *pcibus;
> + QPCIDevice *pcidev;
> + QDict *response;
> + QTestState *qts;
> + int i;
> +
> + qts = qtest_init("-M q35");
> +
> + pcibus = qpci_new_pc(qts, NULL);
> + g_assert(pcibus != NULL);
> +
> + pcidev = qpci_device_find(pcibus, 0);
> + g_assert(pcidev != NULL);
> +
> + /* check that SMRAM is not enabled by default */
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> +
> + /* check that writing junk to 0x9c before before negotiating is ignored */
> + for (i = 0; i < 0xff; i++) {
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
> + }
> +
> + /* enable SMRAM at SMBASE */
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, 0xff);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x01);
> + /* lock SMRAM at SMBASE */
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, 0x02);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x02);
> +
> + /* check that SMRAM at SMBASE is locked and can't be unlocked */
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, 0xff);
> + for (i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
> + /* make sure register is immutable */
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x02);
> +
> + /* RAM access should go into black hole */
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, 0xff);
> + }
> +
> + /* reset */
> + response = qtest_qmp(qts, "{'execute': 'system_reset', 'arguments': {} }");
> + g_assert(response);
> + g_assert(!qdict_haskey(response, "error"));
> + qobject_unref(response);
> +
> + /* check RAM at SMBASE is available after reset */
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_RESET_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_RESET_PATTERN);
> +
> + g_free(pcidev);
> + qpci_free_pc(pcibus);
> +
> + qtest_quit(qts);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_without_smram_base(void)
> +{
> + QPCIBus *pcibus;
> + QPCIDevice *pcidev;
> + QTestState *qts;
> + int i;
> +
> + qts = qtest_init("-M pc-q35-4.1");
> +
> + pcibus = qpci_new_pc(qts, NULL);
> + g_assert(pcibus != NULL);
> +
> + pcidev = qpci_device_find(pcibus, 0);
> + g_assert(pcidev != NULL);
> +
> + /* check that RAM is accessible */
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
> +
> + /* check that writing to 0x9c succeeds */
> + for (i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
> + qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
> + g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == i);
> + }
> +
> + /* check that RAM is still accessible */
> + qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN + 1);
> + g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, (SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN + 1));
> +
> + g_free(pcidev);
> + qpci_free_pc(pcibus);
> +
> + qtest_quit(qts);
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> @@ -197,5 +300,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> qtest_add_data_func("/q35/tseg-size/8mb", &tseg_8mb, test_tseg_size);
> qtest_add_data_func("/q35/tseg-size/ext/16mb", &tseg_ext_16mb,
> test_tseg_size);
> + qtest_add_func("/q35/smram/smbase_lock", test_smram_smbase_lock);
> + qtest_add_func("/q35/smram/legacy_smbase", test_without_smram_base);
> return g_test_run();
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 13:08 [PATCH for-5.0 v2 0/9] q35: CPU hotplug with secure boot, part 1+2 Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 13:08 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 1/9] hw: add compat machines for 5.0 Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 13:08 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 2/9] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 20:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-09 13:08 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 3/9] tests: q35: MCH: add default SMBASE SMRAM lock test Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 13:46 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v3 " Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 20:16 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-12-09 13:08 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 4/9] acpi: cpuhp: spec: clarify 'CPU selector' register usage and endianness Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 13:08 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 5/9] acpi: cpuhp: spec: fix 'Command data' description Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 13:08 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 6/9] acpi: cpuhp: spec: clarify store into 'Command data' when 'Command field' == 0 Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 13:09 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 7/9] acpi: cpuhp: introduce 'Command data 2' field Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 20:27 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-09 13:09 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 8/9] acpi: cpuhp: spec: add typical usecases Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 20:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-09 13:09 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 9/9] acpi: cpuhp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command Igor Mammedov
2019-12-09 20:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-19 13:30 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 0/9] q35: CPU hotplug with secure boot, part 1+2 Igor Mammedov
2019-12-19 14:07 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-06 10:10 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-06 10:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0116dead-489d-e995-8cb5-a90dfdc38ce6@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=dinechin@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.