From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36206)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1YwuHL-00033S-1N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 11:27:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1YwuHG-0001Xh-V0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 11:26:58 -0400
Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:45405)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1YwuHG-0001Tc-On
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 11:26:54 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
	by mailout3.w1.samsung.com
	(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5
	2014)) with ESMTP id <0NOW00AHQW8OZ080@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 16:26:48 +0100 (BST)
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
References: <1430921082-16779-1-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com>
	<1430921082-16779-3-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com>
	<555F28BD.8080001@linaro.org>
In-reply-to: <555F28BD.8080001@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 18:26:42 +0300
Message-id: <013801d096ff$373bfed0$a5b3fc70$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-language: ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/4] Implment GIC-500
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: 'Eric Auger' <eric.auger@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shlomopongratz@gmail.com, 'Shlomo Pongratz' <shlomo.pongratz@huawei.com>

Hi!

> > +static const uint8_t gic_lpi_ids[] = {
> > +    0x44, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x093, 0xB4, 0x3B, 0x00, 0x0D, 0xF0, 0x05, 0xB1
> > +};

 Found one more thing. Shouldn't there be 0x091 instead of 0x093 (5th byte = PIDR0) ? 0x93
is ITS while REDIST is 0x91.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia