From: "Simon Garner" <sgarner@expio.co.nz>
To: SBlaze <dagent.geo@yahoo.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: a sort of n00b question here but I'ld like to know.
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:49:35 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <013f01c39776$2d3ddd30$0301a8c0@SIMON> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031021012423.84839.qmail@web40210.mail.yahoo.com
On Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:24 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
SBlaze <dagent.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ok I did that(with top) My CPU usage for both procs is relativly low.
> They both tend to idle with other visable processes at 96-100% idle.
>
> root@nixn00b:~# vmstat
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
> ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo
> in cs us sy id wa 0 0 27464 5848 22848 44388 0 0
> 1 2 11 8 0 1 99 0
>
Looks fine... sounds to me like this is a red herring, are you sure your
problem is not just with your connection itself? You said:
> The reason I ask is that I have what I think is an unusual amount of
> inbound unsolicited udp traffic(which is dropped by
> iptables/netfilter).
>
Inbound unsolicited traffic will be dropped with or without iptables -
you don't need a firewall to stop that as it won't have anywhere to go
anyway. And you'd have to have a serious amount of traffic to choke the
CPU like that. But, that traffic could be using up your bandwidth of
course... If that's a possibility, you need to find out more about where
the traffic is coming from and where it's going to and why you're
receiving it.
-Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-21 0:02 a sort of n00b question here but I'ld like to know Daniel Chemko
2003-10-21 0:41 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 1:08 ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 1:24 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 1:49 ` Simon Garner [this message]
2003-10-21 2:03 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 2:33 ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 2:49 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 4:46 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-10-21 18:11 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 21:12 ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 22:36 ` SBlaze
2003-10-22 0:08 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-10-21 2:34 ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-10-21 2:56 ` SBlaze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-21 19:44 Daniel Chemko
2003-10-20 23:37 Eric Marchionni
2003-10-20 1:39 SBlaze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='013f01c39776$2d3ddd30$0301a8c0@SIMON' \
--to=sgarner@expio.co.nz \
--cc=dagent.geo@yahoo.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.