All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Simon Garner" <sgarner@expio.co.nz>
To: SBlaze <dagent.geo@yahoo.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: a sort of n00b question here but I'ld like to know.
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:49:35 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <013f01c39776$2d3ddd30$0301a8c0@SIMON> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031021012423.84839.qmail@web40210.mail.yahoo.com

On Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:24 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
SBlaze <dagent.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Ok I did that(with top) My CPU usage for both procs is relativly low.
> They both tend to idle with other visable processes at 96-100% idle.
>
> root@nixn00b:~# vmstat
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
>  ----cpu---- r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo
>  in    cs us sy id wa 0  0  27464   5848  22848  44388    0    0
> 1     2   11     8  0  1 99  0
>

Looks fine... sounds to me like this is a red herring, are you sure your
problem is not just with your connection itself? You said:


> The reason I ask is that I have what I think is an unusual amount of
> inbound unsolicited udp traffic(which is dropped by
> iptables/netfilter).
>

Inbound unsolicited traffic will be dropped with or without iptables -
you don't need a firewall to stop that as it won't have anywhere to go
anyway. And you'd have to have a serious amount of traffic to choke the
CPU like that. But, that traffic could be using up your bandwidth of
course... If that's a possibility, you need to find out more about where
the traffic is coming from and where it's going to and why you're
receiving it.

-Simon



  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-21  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-21  0:02 a sort of n00b question here but I'ld like to know Daniel Chemko
2003-10-21  0:41 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21  1:08   ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21  1:24     ` SBlaze
2003-10-21  1:49       ` Simon Garner [this message]
2003-10-21  2:03         ` SBlaze
2003-10-21  2:33           ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21  2:49             ` SBlaze
2003-10-21  4:46               ` Alistair Tonner
2003-10-21 18:11                 ` SBlaze
2003-10-21 21:12                   ` Simon Garner
2003-10-21 22:36                     ` SBlaze
2003-10-22  0:08                   ` Alistair Tonner
2003-10-21  2:34           ` Jeffrey Laramie
2003-10-21  2:56             ` SBlaze
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-21 19:44 Daniel Chemko
2003-10-20 23:37 Eric Marchionni
2003-10-20  1:39 SBlaze

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='013f01c39776$2d3ddd30$0301a8c0@SIMON' \
    --to=sgarner@expio.co.nz \
    --cc=dagent.geo@yahoo.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.