From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:27:17 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) code In-Reply-To: References: <20080328101907.48eff39d.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <1206718463.7589.345.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> <20080328122933.d0489663.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <20080328174139.ebcc015a.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Message-ID: <014801c8912b$43915b80$cab41280$@Tjernlund@transmode.se> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > -----Original Message----- > From: glikely at secretlab.ca [mailto:glikely at secretlab.ca] On Behalf Of Grant Likely > Sent: den 29 mars 2008 00:12 > To: Kim Phillips > Cc: Joakim Tjernlund; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: cleanup System Part and Revision ID Register (SPRIDR) > code > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Kim Phillips > wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:01:30 +0100 > > "Joakim Tjernlund" wrote: > > > > > BTW, what happened to relocation stuff Grant was doing? It is > > > still disabled, I never had any problems so perhaps time to > > > turn it on again? it might even make u-boot smaller once all the > > > old manuel relocation code has been properly disabled. > > > > > beats me. I'm all for it, but I think we're still supposed to support > > a wide range of toolchain versions (the reason Grant's stuff got > > reverted). > > The main problem is not really understanding how gcc wants to handle > relocation. I've got no idea what needs to be different between > versions of gcc. Someone with greater gcc powers than I needs to take > a look at it. > > g. I am no gcc expert, but perhaps listing which gcc's that don't work is a god start? What archs were problematic? only ppc? There was a register bug for ppc that WD fixed a little while ago, maybe that will help. Jocke