From: "Zqiang" <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
urezki@gmail.com, boqun@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcu: Queue sdp->work when the delay timer is successfully deleted
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 21:58:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01484cd339ea024dd7c01f02a9781f00e67cb52d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anGc7qa8fzrDf7dp@gmail.com>
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:40:14PM +0000, Zqiang wrote:
>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > index b9fe57ff9100..d13c12f61150 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > @@ -751,8 +751,9 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> >
> > // Call srcu_barrier() before this cleanup_srcu_struct()
> > // to avoid triggering this WARN_ON().
> > - if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work)) &&
> > - rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
> > + if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
> > + rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) &&
> > + rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
> >
> Isn't the WARN_ON() the same? thus it will hit again?
WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) && rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist))
Thanks
Zqiang
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 10:06 [PATCH] srcu: Queue sdp->work when the delay timer is successfully deleted Zqiang
2026-07-10 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-31 17:45 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-01 5:19 ` Zqiang
2026-08-03 10:49 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 14:11 ` Zqiang
2026-08-03 14:37 ` Zqiang
2026-08-03 23:40 ` Zqiang
2026-08-04 8:04 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-04 21:58 ` Zqiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01484cd339ea024dd7c01f02a9781f00e67cb52d@linux.dev \
--to=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.