From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7E497E00935; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:24:59 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLY, MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.125.82.53 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (cjb.sw.nospam[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 1.9 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD74E008FC for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l18so853316wgh.12 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:24:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language:importance; bh=vEKwVN30qgg8HD4IR6hFn9yrpcwbQVIYc/71GIeVJDw=; b=KIE91EwLy0dp+1oWESqWIWS9iZV2cthfYCH2h/VeaoIohVXT9xCJQOHK8YnrabH6dt Dse14PygczyeJ75+e18njzPh+Wt95DzWeRKtwoY1ONrFe23VwWYtiJ8vyvL9M1we+Ffq +M2oKykY4kr6J0x6yFK0TOsW0W+raOtKAWoPczM51wDAoR7gF0bRW6u7+1l3osU+ynSC 0uxHcTAgfeFeDepQ5I6vrah6CR9GOWJpulJQOAkQtf660gLMiVsb0OoZ4dc0M6WISSD2 rG6+LqJb1oimMhx/UzIr99YmrWwo+H+EfH95XEraN+yaKKSmd1l68iB6oAIxWeZ+RjX5 zgNg== X-Received: by 10.181.9.99 with SMTP id dr3mr31042412wid.78.1416921895590; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from SIMONENB (88-149-150-170.v4.ngi.it. [88.149.150.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm1885493wjx.31.2014.11.25.05.24.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:24:54 -0800 (PST) From: "Simone" To: "'Daiane Angolini'" References: <184A50C1-D9B1-40F2-AC1A-BA64DD183A0E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:24:52 +0100 Message-ID: <014901d008b3$3319c740$994d55c0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQGnGjxtmoRxSgz5q5l1afUxtVQHLwFwDxoLAnLuuJqcpBmtMA== Importance: High Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org, 'Otavio Salvador' Subject: Re: Status of imx28evk recipes/images X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:24:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: it Hello Daiane, Thanks so much for your answer. Which Kernel version is actually supported by this board? What is the difference between linux-fslc and linux-imx ? Thanks so much Simone -----Messaggio originale----- Da: angolini@gmail.com [mailto:angolini@gmail.com] Per conto di Daiane = Angolini Inviato: marted=C3=AC 25 novembre 2014 11:58 A: Simone; Otavio Salvador Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Oggetto: Re: [meta-freescale] Status of imx28evk recipes/images On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Simone wrote: > Dear All, > In my company we are starting a new project (a low-cost industrial = controller) and we are thinking about use the iMX286 CPU because it = offer all what we need. Of course we would start from imx28evk for = testing, then we will develop our custom board based on that one. > But before all I want to know (from who is already using/mantaining = it), how is the status of support (recipes, images, kernel) for such = board in meta-fsl-arm. > > If possible, I want to know if there are known problems or missing = things, or if this cpu is not suggested for a new project.. > Any opinion you want to share could be very useful to me. imx28evk is a beautiful board. I=C2=B4ve been testing it here and there = and I cannot remember serious problems. Of course, there are some: * touch screen (with x11 at least) is not completely calibrated * you can choose between linux-fslc or linux-imx * you can choose between gstreamer mainline or the one provided by = freescale (see RN [1] in order to understand the HW/SW correlation) * there is a pin conflict in imx28evk board, that I don=C2=B4t remember = from top of my mind (I think it=C2=B4s NAND + Ethernet cannot be used together) * NAND is already supported in meta-fsl-arm * mfgtools is not already supported in meta-fsl-arm, but it=C2=B4s easy = to be included and your patch is appreciated. * pendrive is not automatically mounted, but once you mount it = everything works fine (I have never stopped to fix that) that=C2=B4s all I could remember [1]http://freescale.github.io/doc/release-notes/1.7/index.html#document-f= sl-userspace-pkg Otavio, could some of this items be considered "known issue" to be = included in release notes? What do you think? Daiane > > Thank you all for every suggestion or information you will provide > > Regards > Simone > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale