All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <017c01d3c08a$cf903270$6eb09750$@codeaurora.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 24ed072..307ca62 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,18 +1,23 @@
-Understood, what you mean. I assumed that the cpufreq-dt is generic driver, and adding architecture specific code to it is no not correct from architectural point of view. Anyway, I'm considering adding a platform specific cpufreq driver, which will handle the efuse data as well.
+Understood, what you mean. I assumed that the cpufreq-dt is generic =
+driver, and adding architecture specific code to it is no not correct =
+from architectural point of view. Anyway, I'm considering adding a =
+platform specific cpufreq driver, which will handle the efuse data as =
+well.
 
 Meanwhile this is the way to use the generic driver.
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 22:06
-> To: ilialin@codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
+> To: ilialin@codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; =
+linux-arm-
 > msm@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; sboyd@codeaurora.org
 > Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
 > rnayak@codeaurora.org; robh@kernel.org; will.deacon@arm.com;
 > amit.kucheria@linaro.org; tfinkel@codeaurora.org;
 > nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org; celster@codeaurora.org
 > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996
-> 
+>=20
 > Quoting ilialin@codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)
 > > > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Quoting Ilia Lin (2018-02-14
 > > > 05:59:51)
@@ -22,24 +27,27 @@ Meanwhile this is the way to use the generic driver.
 > > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
 > > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
 > > > > @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@
-> > > >         { .compatible = "xlnx,zynq-7000", },
-> > > >         { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp", },
+> > > >         { .compatible =3D "xlnx,zynq-7000", },
+> > > >         { .compatible =3D "xlnx,zynqmp", },
 > > > >
-> > > > +       { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", },
-> > > > +       { .compatible = "qcom,apq8096", },
+> > > > +       { .compatible =3D "qcom,msm8996", },
+> > > > +       { .compatible =3D "qcom,apq8096", },
 > > > > +
 > > >
 > > > Why can't we base it on the kryocc node being present?
-> > This could be good idea, if I would writing a platform specific cpufreq driver,
+> > This could be good idea, if I would writing a platform specific =
+cpufreq driver,
 > which may be a future option.
-> 
+>=20
 > Well maybe cpufreq-dt can also look at the cpus nodes for a cpu with a
-> certain type (in this case kryo). Then we can add cpufreq dt based on that
+> certain type (in this case kryo). Then we can add cpufreq dt based on =
+that
 > CPU node being there.
-> 
+>=20
 > > > Or even populate
 > > > the cpufreq-dt from the kryocc driver?
-> > There is a problem that during the clock probe the OPP table still doesn't
+> > There is a problem that during the clock probe the OPP table still =
+doesn't
 > exist.
-> 
+>=20
 > The OPP table is in DT? Why doesn't it exist?
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f2666ce..fbfd61d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -7,36 +7,41 @@
  "Subject\0RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:34:04 +0200\0"
  "To\0'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>"
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
- " sboyd@codeaurora.org\0"
- "Cc\0mark.rutland@arm.com"
-  devicetree@vger.kernel.org
-  rnayak@codeaurora.org
-  robh@kernel.org
-  will.deacon@arm.com
-  amit.kucheria@linaro.org
-  tfinkel@codeaurora.org
-  nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org
- " celster@codeaurora.org\0"
+  <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+  <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
+  <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
+ " <sboyd@codeaurora.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0<mark.rutland@arm.com>"
+  <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
+  <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
+  <robh@kernel.org>
+  <will.deacon@arm.com>
+  <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
+  <tfinkel@codeaurora.org>
+  <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>
+ " <celster@codeaurora.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "Understood, what you mean. I assumed that the cpufreq-dt is generic driver, and adding architecture specific code to it is no not correct from architectural point of view. Anyway, I'm considering adding a platform specific cpufreq driver, which will handle the efuse data as well.\n"
+ "Understood, what you mean. I assumed that the cpufreq-dt is generic =\n"
+ "driver, and adding architecture specific code to it is no not correct =\n"
+ "from architectural point of view. Anyway, I'm considering adding a =\n"
+ "platform specific cpufreq driver, which will handle the efuse data as =\n"
+ "well.\n"
  "\n"
  "Meanwhile this is the way to use the generic driver.\n"
  "\n"
  "> -----Original Message-----\n"
  "> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>\n"
  "> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 22:06\n"
- "> To: ilialin@codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-\n"
+ "> To: ilialin@codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; =\n"
+ "linux-arm-\n"
  "> msm@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; sboyd@codeaurora.org\n"
  "> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;\n"
  "> rnayak@codeaurora.org; robh@kernel.org; will.deacon@arm.com;\n"
  "> amit.kucheria@linaro.org; tfinkel@codeaurora.org;\n"
  "> nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org; celster@codeaurora.org\n"
  "> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Quoting ilialin@codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)\n"
  "> > > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Quoting Ilia Lin (2018-02-14\n"
  "> > > 05:59:51)\n"
@@ -46,26 +51,29 @@
  "> > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c\n"
  "> > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c\n"
  "> > > > @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@\n"
- "> > > >         { .compatible = \"xlnx,zynq-7000\", },\n"
- "> > > >         { .compatible = \"xlnx,zynqmp\", },\n"
+ "> > > >         { .compatible =3D \"xlnx,zynq-7000\", },\n"
+ "> > > >         { .compatible =3D \"xlnx,zynqmp\", },\n"
  "> > > >\n"
- "> > > > +       { .compatible = \"qcom,msm8996\", },\n"
- "> > > > +       { .compatible = \"qcom,apq8096\", },\n"
+ "> > > > +       { .compatible =3D \"qcom,msm8996\", },\n"
+ "> > > > +       { .compatible =3D \"qcom,apq8096\", },\n"
  "> > > > +\n"
  "> > >\n"
  "> > > Why can't we base it on the kryocc node being present?\n"
- "> > This could be good idea, if I would writing a platform specific cpufreq driver,\n"
+ "> > This could be good idea, if I would writing a platform specific =\n"
+ "cpufreq driver,\n"
  "> which may be a future option.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Well maybe cpufreq-dt can also look at the cpus nodes for a cpu with a\n"
- "> certain type (in this case kryo). Then we can add cpufreq dt based on that\n"
+ "> certain type (in this case kryo). Then we can add cpufreq dt based on =\n"
+ "that\n"
  "> CPU node being there.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> > > Or even populate\n"
  "> > > the cpufreq-dt from the kryocc driver?\n"
- "> > There is a problem that during the clock probe the OPP table still doesn't\n"
+ "> > There is a problem that during the clock probe the OPP table still =\n"
+ "doesn't\n"
  "> exist.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  > The OPP table is in DT? Why doesn't it exist?
 
-3cb5fd2d80b7b90d9e80819ed6a4541b72dbd8044a4674f931ae7e1e638dc88d
+f0baa1ae5305479516842cdcf981e10b825bc1d6d8e5fbb107d6c85261782f41

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 24ed072..4105480 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -5,15 +5,15 @@ Meanwhile this is the way to use the generic driver.
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 22:06
-> To: ilialin@codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
-> msm@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; sboyd@codeaurora.org
-> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
-> rnayak@codeaurora.org; robh@kernel.org; will.deacon@arm.com;
-> amit.kucheria@linaro.org; tfinkel@codeaurora.org;
-> nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org; celster@codeaurora.org
+> To: ilialin at codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
+> msm at vger.kernel.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; sboyd at codeaurora.org
+> Cc: mark.rutland at arm.com; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
+> rnayak at codeaurora.org; robh at kernel.org; will.deacon at arm.com;
+> amit.kucheria at linaro.org; tfinkel at codeaurora.org;
+> nicolas.dechesne at linaro.org; celster at codeaurora.org
 > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996
 > 
-> Quoting ilialin@codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)
+> Quoting ilialin at codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)
 > > > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Quoting Ilia Lin (2018-02-14
 > > > 05:59:51)
 > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index f2666ce..8bb2ac5 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -3,23 +3,10 @@
  "ref\0152147812199.242365.11821734771337881765@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com\0"
  "ref\0013a01d3c051$d65a9160$830fb420$@codeaurora.org\0"
  "ref\0152157637794.125118.12382168941652366593@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com\0"
- "From\0<ilialin@codeaurora.org>\0"
- "Subject\0RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996\0"
+ "From\0ilialin@codeaurora.org (ilialin at codeaurora.org)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:34:04 +0200\0"
- "To\0'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>"
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
- " sboyd@codeaurora.org\0"
- "Cc\0mark.rutland@arm.com"
-  devicetree@vger.kernel.org
-  rnayak@codeaurora.org
-  robh@kernel.org
-  will.deacon@arm.com
-  amit.kucheria@linaro.org
-  tfinkel@codeaurora.org
-  nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org
- " celster@codeaurora.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Understood, what you mean. I assumed that the cpufreq-dt is generic driver, and adding architecture specific code to it is no not correct from architectural point of view. Anyway, I'm considering adding a platform specific cpufreq driver, which will handle the efuse data as well.\n"
@@ -29,15 +16,15 @@
  "> -----Original Message-----\n"
  "> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>\n"
  "> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 22:06\n"
- "> To: ilialin@codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-\n"
- "> msm@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; sboyd@codeaurora.org\n"
- "> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;\n"
- "> rnayak@codeaurora.org; robh@kernel.org; will.deacon@arm.com;\n"
- "> amit.kucheria@linaro.org; tfinkel@codeaurora.org;\n"
- "> nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org; celster@codeaurora.org\n"
+ "> To: ilialin at codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-\n"
+ "> msm at vger.kernel.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; sboyd at codeaurora.org\n"
+ "> Cc: mark.rutland at arm.com; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;\n"
+ "> rnayak at codeaurora.org; robh at kernel.org; will.deacon at arm.com;\n"
+ "> amit.kucheria at linaro.org; tfinkel at codeaurora.org;\n"
+ "> nicolas.dechesne at linaro.org; celster at codeaurora.org\n"
  "> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996\n"
  "> \n"
- "> Quoting ilialin@codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)\n"
+ "> Quoting ilialin at codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)\n"
  "> > > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Quoting Ilia Lin (2018-02-14\n"
  "> > > 05:59:51)\n"
  "> > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c\n"
@@ -68,4 +55,4 @@
  "> \n"
  > The OPP table is in DT? Why doesn't it exist?
 
-3cb5fd2d80b7b90d9e80819ed6a4541b72dbd8044a4674f931ae7e1e638dc88d
+b55f15e3908158c156fb9e202198f56b809562855908799b7da19c99dc607fbd

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.