Re: load balanced adsl lines

["Ming-Ching Tiew" <mingching.tiew@redtone.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1243 bytes --]


I struggled on this for a few months and I finally throw away the 
"multiple weight" default route method. FWMARK/CONNMARK 
is the way to go. More information, read this 

           http://www.geocities.com/mctiew/ffw/dual.htm

You may not want to use it for whatever reason you think
appropriate but please read the 'Introduction' where I 
explained how I failed badly using that method.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mark Coetser 
  To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org 
  Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 6:52 PM
  Subject: load balanced adsl lines


  Hi Ppl

  I have 5 adsl lines that after reading quite a bit i managed to get load balanced now abvoiusly it doesnt load balance evenly and this works on what routes are still in the routing cache. my question is my outbound masquerading had to be modified to use snat in iptables instead of just plain masquerading my outbound masquerading now works but my inbound port forwarding doesnt work would this be an iptables problem or a routing issue...

  i have opened all the relavent ports on each of the interfaces and I am not getting any logged denies the connection just never opens

  I am running the following

  debian woody

  kernel 2.6.6


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3381 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: InterScan_SafeStamp.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 250 bytes --]

****** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT ******

** No virus found in attached file noname.htm
** No virus found in attached file noname.htm

This mail has been scanned by InterScan.
*****************     End of message     ***************