From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from p3plsmtpa09-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([173.201.193.239]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Zepmz-0003J6-3U for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:33:14 +0000 From: "William Riba" References: <019a01d0f631$6d01cf90$47056eb0$@wriba.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: QCA9880/9890 rfkill Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:32:53 -0500 Message-ID: <019e01d0f636$a5b2f4e0$f118dea0$@wriba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-us List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: 'Adrian Chadd' Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Hi Adrian - thank you for the quick response. I assume you're referring the otp.bin firmware file? Is there a mapping of the OTP to EEPROM settings available? That would be an easy fix if I can make a modification there to activate RFKILL. -bill -----Original Message----- From: adrian.chadd@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adrian Chadd Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:58 PM To: William Riba Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880/9890 rfkill Hi, The GPIO line needs to be hooked in via the relevant EEPROM/OTP setting so the firmware programs things in correctly. Go dump the OTP and see what the rfkill firmware line is. -adrian On 23 September 2015 at 11:55, William Riba wrote: > Does anybody know whether rfkill in its hard block flavor is supported > in any QCA9880/9890 based device and/or firmware load? While vendors > refer to the WiFi disable/GPIO line in their reference schematics, it > is not functional. What I see after testing multiple cards is if the > line is asserted during operation, there seems to be no effect. If it > is asserted at boot-up, the device does not enumerate on the PCI bus. > > If Qualcomm does not intend to support this functionality anymore it > would be nice to know. Hard kills are a regulatory requirement for > certain applications. While we would like to use a QCA9890 in a new > application, there's no way it could make it through qualifications > with its current operation. Any additional information on this would be welcome. Thanks. > > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k