From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:16:22 +0300 Message-ID: <019e01d13974$c432fb00$4c98f100$@samsung.com> References: <56724519.80108@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <56724519.80108@samsung.com> Content-language: ru List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Mark Rutland' , 'Pawel Moll' , 'Ian Campbell' , 'Rob Herring' , 'Kukjin Kim' , 'Kumar Gala' List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hello! > 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my > previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so > depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may > not go into v4.5 (yay...). > > 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further > for v4.6. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it until it goes to stable. P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm: 1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos 2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and shouldn't this file be moved to (2)? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.fedin@samsung.com (Pavel Fedin) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:16:22 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 In-Reply-To: <56724519.80108@samsung.com> References: <56724519.80108@samsung.com> Message-ID: <019e01d13974$c432fb00$4c98f100$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello! > 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my > previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so > depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may > not go into v4.5 (yay...). > > 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further > for v4.6. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it until it goes to stable. P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm: 1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos 2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and shouldn't this file be moved to (2)? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966613AbbLRJSq (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:18:46 -0500 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:39152 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934826AbbLRJQ1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:16:27 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f79b16d000005389-25-5673cee8dc0e From: Pavel Fedin To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "'Rob Herring'" , "'Pawel Moll'" , "'Mark Rutland'" , "'Ian Campbell'" , "'Kumar Gala'" , "'Kukjin Kim'" References: <56724519.80108@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <56724519.80108@samsung.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:16:22 +0300 Message-id: <019e01d13974$c432fb00$4c98f100$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQIGom+Z8CD0MfMqNq0kc+yEGhXnWgHYTR3jnlbgviA= Content-language: ru X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprLIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7ovzhWHGVx6KWgx/8g5Vov+NwtZ Lc69Wslo8fqFoUX/49fMFpseX2O1uLxrDpvFjPP7mCyWXr/IZDFh+loWi9a9R9gduD3WzFvD 6HG5r5fJY+XyL2wem1Z1snlsXlLv0bdlFaPH501yAexRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBmrXl5lKtjE UTGp6RJrA+M1ti5GTg4JAROJ/a8uMkHYYhIX7q0HinNxCAksZZSYc+UVM4TznVHi4pnFYFVs AuoSp79+YAFJiAjsYpT4taUbzGEWeMMocWrZY2aQKiGBUImpxx4DdXBwcApoSrQ+1wEJCwtE SUzduwNsEIuAqkTXkq2MIDavgKXEpafHmSFsQYkfk++xgNjMAloS63ceZ4Kw5SU2r3nLDHGq gsSOs6/BekUErCSOvOpkhagRkZj27x7zBEahWUhGzUIyahaSUbOQtCxgZFnFKJpamlxQnJSe a6RXnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERJpX3cwLj1mdYhRgINRiYf3BnNxmBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiURXsHj QCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK8M3e9DxESSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUwcrNvst3/ MmnLGUG+Da0Xm4KnTHUS2KOw61bgroXq38VVHVkF5yqcaE/jlvf0KmFZXChhd6G27GXHe+0L ej2/Tbb9+G98ZzZT3c0Zjckc2789a3VTXX99Xq615UTXhInBH7kvvXvMctV6ouCa+YHCdwQF hB2dDi26H97b2CscE+R85vhm382qSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAaFo5B7ACAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my > previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so > depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may > not go into v4.5 (yay...). > > 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further > for v4.6. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it until it goes to stable. P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm: 1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos 2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and shouldn't this file be moved to (2)? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia