From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/madvise: disallow guard region installation in uffd-armed VMAs
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:58:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b19c1e-b87d-4996-acaa-cd5103f30edb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-disallow-uffd-guard-install-v1-1-bcf8b1aaa72e@kernel.org>
On 11/12/26 18:38, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> In order to establish guard regions, guard markers are installed in the
> page tables of a mapped VMA.
>
> However, problems arise when one tries to combine this with registering a
> VMA for userfaultfd, as such operations may themselves need to install page
> table markers such as uffd-wp.
>
> When this installation is attempted the guard marker prevents these markers
> being applied, which can lead to unexpected results (especially if the
> guard regions are later removed.)
>
> This is especially problematic because guard region installation causes the
> regions to be zapped first, meaning that the removal of userfaultfd-tracked
> ranges will not be logged in this case.
>
> Therefore, disallow this.
>
> This makes sense as conceptually, guard regions mark a part of a VMA as
> effectively unmapped at the page table level, and removing the markers is
> like mapping the VMA again, over which operation uffd markers would in any
> case be lost.
>
> Only check for this on installation, as a VMA can be registered for
> userfaultfd after guard regions are established.
>
> In this case, the guard regions cannot have new markers installed, and no
> faults can occur in the guard regions, until they are removed, at which
> point everything should function normally.
So IIUC this means the other order of operations (first guard regions, then
uffd) already prevents the two co-existing. Makes sense to prevent the same
in the order of uffd and then guard regions then.
> A survey of open source users indicates nobody is relying on installing
> guard regions in uffd-armed VMAs. Software including glibc, android,
> tcmalloc and CRIU were checked.
>
> Fix the selftest to reflect the change.
>
> Fixes: 662df3e5c376 ("mm: madvise: implement lightweight guard page mechanism")
> Reported-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-uffd-state-fixes-v1-9-00713d368976@columbia.edu/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-uffd-state-fixes-v1-10-00713d368976@columbia.edu/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-uffd-state-fixes-v1-11-00713d368976@columbia.edu/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 4 ++++
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 0214efd2a014..268731e90f12 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -1156,6 +1156,10 @@ static long madvise_guard_install(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
> if (!is_valid_guard_vma(vma, /* allow_locked = */false))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Guard markers are incompatible with UFFD markers. */
> + if (userfaultfd_armed(vma))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * Set atomically under read lock. All pertinent readers will need to
> * acquire an mmap/VMA write lock to read it. All remaining readers may
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> index 02f69244f9a4..97da54dcf3a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, cold_pageout)
> ASSERT_EQ(munmap(ptr, 10 * page_size), 0);
> }
>
> -/* Ensure that guard pages do not break userfaultd. */
> +/* Ensure that guard regions cannot be installed in uffd-armed VMAs. */
> TEST_F(guard_regions, uffd)
> {
> const unsigned long page_size = self->page_size;
> @@ -1526,10 +1526,15 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, uffd)
> reg.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
> ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, ®), 0);
>
> - /* Guard the range. This should not trigger the uffd. */
> + /* Now try to guard, should fail with EINVAL. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL), -1);
> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
> +
> + /* Once unregistered, we should be able to guard the range. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &range), 0);
> ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL), 0);
>
> - /* The guarding should behave as usual with no uffd intervention. */
> + /* The guarding should behave as usual. */
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> char *curr = &ptr[i * page_size];
>
> @@ -1537,7 +1542,6 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, uffd)
> }
>
> /* Cleanup. */
> - ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &range), 0);
> close(uffd);
> ASSERT_EQ(munmap(ptr, 10 * page_size), 0);
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 4318887a3efa4c53d6f083ccfd7105b809a3ac65
> change-id: 20261112-disallow-uffd-guard-install-a5294129ad7b
>
> Cheers,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 17:38 [PATCH] mm/madvise: disallow guard region installation in uffd-armed VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 20:59 ` Liam R. Howlett
2026-11-12 23:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 8:58 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01b19c1e-b87d-4996-acaa-cd5103f30edb@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.