All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
To: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID0 performance question
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:08:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01ca01c5f2a3$ab6ebf00$0400a8c0@dcccs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5d96567b0511260756t3989df8ep8c98326fc394ca18@mail.gmail.com

Hello, Raz,

Think this is not cpu usage problem. :-)
The system is divided to 4 cpuset, and each cpuset uses only one disknode.
(CPU0->nb0, CPU1->nb1, ...)

this top is under cat /dev/md31 (raid0)

Thanks,
Janos

 17:16:01  up 14:19,  4 users,  load average: 7.74, 5.03, 4.20
305 processes: 301 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states:  33.1% user  47.0% system    0.0% nice   0.0% iowait  18.0%
idle
CPU1 states:  21.0% user  52.0% system    0.0% nice   6.0% iowait  19.0%
idle
CPU2 states:   2.0% user  74.0% system    0.0% nice   3.0% iowait  18.0%
idle
CPU3 states:  10.0% user  57.0% system    0.0% nice   5.0% iowait  26.0%
idle
Mem:  4149412k av, 3961084k used,  188328k free,       0k shrd,  557032k
buff
       911068k active,            2881680k inactive
Swap:       0k av,       0k used,       0k free                 2779388k
cached

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME CPU COMMAND
 2410 root       0 -19  1584  108    36 S <  48.3  0.0  21:57   3 nbd-client
16191 root      25   0  4832  820   664 R    48.3  0.0   3:04   0 grep
 2408 root       0 -19  1588  112    36 S <  47.3  0.0  24:05   2 nbd-client
 2406 root       0 -19  1584  108    36 S <  40.8  0.0  22:56   1 nbd-client
18126 root      18   0  5780 1604   508 D    38.0  0.0   0:12   1 dd
 2404 root       0 -19  1588  112    36 S <  36.2  0.0  22:56   0 nbd-client
  294 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    7.4  0.0   3:22   1 kswapd0
 2284 root      16   0 13500 5376  3040 S     7.4  0.1   8:53   2 httpd
18307 root      16   0  6320 2232  1432 S     4.6  0.0   0:00   2 sendmail
16789 root      16   0  5472 1552   952 R     3.7  0.0   0:03   3 top
 2431 root      10  -5     0    0     0 SW<   2.7  0.0   7:32   2 md2_raid1
29076 root      17   0  4776  772   680 S     2.7  0.0   1:09   3 xfs_fsr
 6955 root      15   0  1588  108    36 S     2.7  0.0   0:56   2 nbd-client

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@gmail.com>
To: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: RAID0 performance question


> look at the cpu consumption.
>
> On 11/26/05, JaniD++ <djani22@dynamicweb.hu> wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have searching the bottleneck of my system, and found something what i
> > cant cleanly understand.
> >
> > I have use NBD with 4 disk nodes. (raidtab is the bottom of mail)
> >
> > The cat /dev/nb# >/dev/null    makes ~ 350 Mbit/s on each nodes.
> > The cat /dev/nb0 + nb1 + nb2 + nb3 in one time parallel makes ~ 780-800
> > Mbit/s. - i think this is my network bottleneck.
> >
> > But the cat /dev/md31 >/dev/null (RAID0, the sum of 4 nodes) only makes
> > ~450-490 Mbit/s, and i dont know why....
> >
> > Somebody have an idea? :-)
> >
> > (the nb31,30,29,28 only possible mirrors)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Janos
> >
> > raiddev         /dev/md1
> > raid-level      1
> > nr-raid-disks   2
> > chunk-size      32
> > persistent-superblock 1
> > device          /dev/nb0
> > raid-disk       0
> > device          /dev/nb31
> > raid-disk       1
> > failed-disk     /dev/nb31
> >
> > raiddev         /dev/md2
> > raid-level      1
> > nr-raid-disks   2
> > chunk-size      32
> > persistent-superblock 1
> > device          /dev/nb1
> > raid-disk       0
> > device          /dev/hb30
> > raid-disk       1
> > failed-disk     /dev/nb30
> >
> > raiddev         /dev/md3
> > raid-level      1
> > nr-raid-disks   2
> > chunk-size      32
> > persistent-superblock 1
> > device          /dev/nb2
> > raid-disk       0
> > device          /dev/nb29
> > raid-disk       1
> > failed-disk     /dev/nb29
> >
> > raiddev         /dev/md4
> > raid-level      1
> > nr-raid-disks   2
> > chunk-size      32
> > persistent-superblock 1
> > device          /dev/nb3
> > raid-disk       0
> > device          /dev/nb28
> > raid-disk       1
> > failed-disk     /dev/nb28
> >
> > raiddev         /dev/md31
> > raid-level      0
> > nr-raid-disks   4
> > chunk-size      32
> > persistent-superblock 1
> > device          /dev/md1
> > raid-disk       0
> > device          /dev/md2
> > raid-disk       1
> > device          /dev/md3
> > raid-disk       2
> > device          /dev/md4
> > raid-disk       3
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Raz


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-26 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-18 19:34 mdadm 2.1: command line option parsing bug? Andreas Haumer
2005-11-21 23:21 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22 11:21   ` Michael Tokarev
2005-11-24  5:15     ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22 15:41   ` Molle Bestefich
2005-11-24  5:25     ` Neil Brown
2005-11-24  7:31       ` Ross Vandegrift
2005-12-15  1:53       ` Molle Bestefich
2005-12-15  4:19         ` Neil Brown
2005-12-15 10:37           ` Molle Bestefich
2005-11-22 22:05   ` Andre Noll
2005-11-26 14:04     ` RAID0 performance question JaniD++
2005-11-26 15:56       ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2005-11-26 16:08         ` JaniD++ [this message]
2005-11-26 17:11           ` Lajber Zoltan
2005-11-26 17:34             ` JaniD++
2005-11-26 19:47               ` Lajber Zoltan
2005-11-26 23:27       ` Neil Brown
2005-11-26 23:37         ` JaniD++
2005-11-27 15:39         ` Al Boldi
2005-11-27 16:21           ` JaniD++
2005-11-27 17:40             ` Al Boldi
2005-11-27 19:02               ` JaniD++
2005-11-30 23:13               ` JaniD++
2005-12-02 19:53                 ` Al Boldi
2005-12-18  0:13                   ` JaniD++
2005-12-19 11:16                     ` Al Boldi
2005-11-22  1:14                       ` JaniD++
2005-11-23 10:48                       ` JaniD++
2005-12-21  1:40                     ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22  1:56                       ` JaniD++
2005-12-22  4:49                         ` Neil Brown
2005-11-23  9:44                           ` JaniD++

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01ca01c5f2a3$ab6ebf00$0400a8c0@dcccs' \
    --to=djani22@dynamicweb.hu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raziebe@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.