From: "Matt Sealey" <matt@genesi-usa.com>
To: "'Jon Loeliger'" <jdl@jdl.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: cpu power "management" for non-dfs chips with no pmu (for instance, 750cxe and mpc7447 in pegasos)
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:58:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01ca01c696cd$2e453f30$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1FtlnK-0007Zt-Tx@jdl.com>
I have nothing real to contribute other than I would like to see it :)
Before I asked I checked Google (as is expected of anyone these days)
and found some discussions on debian-powerpc from 2002 but nobody
really did anything and nothing really came of it. I know 4 years later
all we have is powernowd which pokes up cpufreq which only supports
DFS and certain kinds of Mac PMU.
ICTC is such a simple thing to support and you can slow down the CPU
pretty comprehensively (from halving to 255x in theory) with an on and
off flag. I am surprised nobody implemented a cpufreq governer even if
it is totally useless and gives no perceivable benefits..
--
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Manager, Genesi, Developer Relations
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Loeliger [mailto:jdl@jdl.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:34 AM
> To: matt@genesi-usa.com
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: cpu power "management" for non-dfs chips with no
> pmu (for instance, 750cxe and mpc7447 in pegasos)
>
> So, like, the other day "Matt Sealey" mumbled:
> >
> > I am basically trying to evaluate if we can do ANYTHING to reduce
> > power consumption of systems which are idle, as I have noticed that
> > ...
> >
> > Comments? :)
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> There is an effort afoot to revitalize some of the Linux
> Power Management issues, erm, currently going on over on the
> linux-pm list these days. No immediate results (yet), but
> there is some concerted effort. It should include some
> PowerPC presence.
>
> Please feel free to contribute, of course. :-)
>
> jdl
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-23 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-23 10:43 cpu power "management" for non-dfs chips with no pmu (for instance, 750cxe and mpc7447 in pegasos) Matt Sealey
2006-06-23 13:33 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-06-23 13:58 ` Matt Sealey [this message]
2006-06-23 14:26 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-06-23 14:31 ` Matt Sealey
2006-06-23 14:38 ` Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck
2006-06-23 23:49 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-06-24 16:16 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-06-24 17:29 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-06-27 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-06-27 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01ca01c696cd$2e453f30$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net' \
--to=matt@genesi-usa.com \
--cc=jdl@jdl.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.