From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:50:03 +0900 Message-ID: <01d001cf3ccc$39f339b0$add9ad10$@samsung.com> References: <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> <20140309183523.GD22881@quad.lixom.net> <531CFA28.9020600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:20829 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753562AbaCKBuJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:50:09 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr4.samsung.com (u144.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.144]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N290040W13IRN00@mailout1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:50:06 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Olof Johansson' , 'Tomasz Figa' Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Mike Turquette' , arm@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, khilman@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll > >> hold > >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect > >> they'll be > >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > > > > > > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK > my > > own patches. ;) > > > > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > > > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's response. BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:50:03 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15 In-Reply-To: References: <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> <20140309183523.GD22881@quad.lixom.net> <531CFA28.9020600@gmail.com> Message-ID: <01d001cf3ccc$39f339b0$add9ad10$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll > >> hold > >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect > >> they'll be > >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. > > > > > > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK > my > > own patches. ;) > > > > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: > > > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's response. BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that? - Kukjin