RE: [RFC] squelch log4j inquiries

[<rsbecker@nexbridge.com>]

On December 23, 2021 6:52 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I wonder if we should do something like this, for limited time like a few
> months or so, so that we have something prominently shown at places like
> https://github.com/git/git/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
>  README.md | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git c/README.md w/README.md
> index f6f43e78de..76e99fe5bb 100644
> --- c/README.md
> +++ w/README.md
> @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control
system
> with an  unusually rich command set that provides both high-level
operations
> and full access to internals.
> 
> +No part of Git is written in Java, hence it is not susceptible to the
> +log4j vulnerability that has been causing sensation recently.
> +
>  Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public  License
> version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses,  compatible with
the
> GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus

This is a good idea. I have had to reassure a whole bunch of people in my
community about this, not really because of git itself but because of the
Maven build associated with EGit/JGit that may (do) have this issue if the
wrong version of log4j is available. I would rather not discuss the
particulars of the attack vector in this mailing list.

--Randall