From: "Marcus Felipe Pereira" <marcus@task.com.br>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB rate miscalculation
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 15:36:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01e801c55251$6be8e1a0$1f00a8c0@Micro1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <029901c550fc$77524c30$1f00a8c0@Micro1>
>> Hi,
>> I've migrated my tc configuration from CBQ to HTB.
>>
>> One problem appeared. Htb seems to miscalculate the bandwidth for
>> classes with greater rates.
>> For rates below 2Mbit there is almost no difference between the
>> configured and the measured rate.
>>
>> For large ones the problem starts. My root class has 10Mbit rate and
>> when the interface has heavy trafic the measured bandwidth coudn't get
>> more then 8.5Mbit.
>>
>> "# tc -s class show ...." shows that the root class has about the
>> 10Mbit, but the link stats shows mutch less.
>>
>> The solution was to put the htb ceil on about 12Mbit. Then I can get to
>> the 10Mbit. When using CBQ I didn't have this problem.
>>
>> Is there any parameter that I can change to correct the rate
>> calculation?
>> Any one has similar problem?
>
> What counters are you using to measure?
>
> Does it do the same if you test with a single tcp stream and a very simple
> setup like -
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1
>
> Andy.
I've done more tests, in fact there is a difference in the measure.
The rate measured by htb class, iptraf and iptables show very similar
numbers.
The rate measured using SNMP ifInOctets and ifOutOctets (snmpget, ddrtool
and mrtg) show rates about 20% less than htb.
Why this difference?
Marcus
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-06 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 22:56 [LARTC] HTB rate miscalculation Marcus Felipe Pereira
2005-05-06 0:19 ` Andy Furniss
2005-05-06 15:36 ` Marcus Felipe Pereira [this message]
2005-05-09 22:21 ` Andy Furniss
2005-05-10 13:17 ` Marcus Felipe Pereira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01e801c55251$6be8e1a0$1f00a8c0@Micro1' \
--to=marcus@task.com.br \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.