All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>
To: "Jim Gifford" <jim@jg555.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:15:51 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01f101c3419f$e6d30360$3300a8c0@Slepetys> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 13e101c3419d$f62f9410$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02

Hi Jim,
It's exacly the same problem, after about 12-24 hour everything locks up,
but I can still ping (sometimes).

But the syslog stops, and I only reboot by hardware, because the CTL+ALT+DEL
doesn't works, and the terminal either.

It's a SMP (dual pentium III) too, but after some tests with single CPU and
NOAPIC parameter to the kernel, the trouble continues.

I have no clue for what kind of tests I can do to generate the trouble, or
for what logs, or files to look for.

[]s
Slepetys



> Roberto,
>     How does this problem manifest itself. I think it's the same problem
> that I'm having. Let me know what you think. I'm using the megaraid driver
> and aic7xxx driver. After about a 12-20 hour period, everything locks up,
> but there is not error message. The kernel sysreq information does work
and
> I'm able to reboot.
>
> top - 12:59:05 up  3:02,  2 users,  load average: 4.17, 4.35, 4.38
> Tasks: 122 total,   5 running, 117 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
>  Cpu0 :  25.0% user,  50.0% system,  25.0% nice,   0.0% idle
>  Cpu1 :  62.5% user,  31.2% system,   0.0% nice,   6.2% idle
> Mem:   1033896k total,   823636k used,   210260k free,   160412k buffers
> Swap:  1060280k total,        0k used,  1060280k free,   352848k cached
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>
> To: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>; "Justin T.
> Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
>
>
> > Ops....
> > The linux box halted again, after 12 hours operating normaly.
> >
> > The more strange is that there isn't any message in the
/var/log/message,
> > the system simples stop to respond, and some strange behavior is that
the
> > TOP comand gaves me :
> >
> > 15:10:15     up   33 min, 1 user, load average: 1.06, 1.17, 1.14
> > 91 processes: 90 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> > CPU0 states:   0.0% user   3.1% system    0.0% nice   0.0% iowait  96.2%
> > idle
> > CPU1 states:   0.0% user   0.1% system    0.0% nice   0.0% iowait  99.2%
> > idle
> > Mem:   513172k av,  437740k used,   75432k free,       0k shrd,   17500k
> > buff
> >                     258436k actv,   41792k in_d,   76644k in_c
> > Swap: 1060088k av,      44k used, 1060044k free                  339860k
> > cached
> >
> >   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME CPU
COMMAND
> >     9 root      16   0     0    0     0 SW    0.8  0.0   0:02   0
> > kscand/Normal
> >    31 root      15   0     0    0     0 DW    0.5  0.0   0:05   0
> raid1syncd
> >  2425 root      15   0  1088 1088   864 R     0.2  0.2   0:00   1 top
> >     1 root      15   0   396  396   344 S     0.0  0.0   0:03   1 init
> >     2 root      RT   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> > migration/0
> > ... others...
> >
> > Meanning that the Load Average is incompatible with the use of the CPUs.
> >
> > I really have no idea where to find some clue about what is going on.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Roberto Slepetys
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>
> > To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>;
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I upgraded it for the 6.2.36, using RPM and I am making some heavy
> tests.
> > >
> > > Until now, it's ok, and for this kind of tests, the old configuration
> gave
> > > some trouble.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Slepetys
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
> > > To: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>;
> > > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:14 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
> > >
> > >
> > > > > The system halts easily if I do a large I/O, like reindexing a
> > database,
> > > > > giving me some messages like: (scsi0:A:1:0): Locking max tag count
> at
> > > 128...
> > > >
> > > > The "Locking max tag count" messages are normal.  It means the SCSI
> > > > driver was able to determine the maximum queue depth of your drive.
> > > >
> > > > 6.2.8 is rather old.  I don't know that upgrading the aic7xxx driver
> > > > will solve your problem, but it might be worth a shot.  The latest
> > > > is available here:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gibbs/linux/SRC/
> > > >
> > > > After upgrading, you should be at 6.2.36.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Justin
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-03 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-02 14:44 Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
2003-07-02 15:14 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-07-02 21:00   ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
2003-07-03 18:29     ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
     [not found]       ` <13e101c3419d$f62f9410$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02>
2003-07-03 20:15         ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira [this message]
2003-07-03 21:20           ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-07-03 23:04             ` Jim Gifford
2003-07-05 20:15               ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-07-05 20:28                 ` Jim Gifford
2003-07-03 22:49       ` Matthias Andree
2003-07-03 23:09         ` Jim Gifford
     [not found] <4R5X.8bo.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <4Rzh.h8.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <4WSg.5H7.21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <5h0y.5ht.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <5iIR.7Cp.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <5iIQ.7Cp.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <5jOA.14o.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <5lnu.2l7.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-04 17:36               ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
2003-07-05 20:27                 ` Justin T. Gibbs
     [not found]       ` <5ldB.2cK.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-04 17:38         ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01f101c3419f$e6d30360$3300a8c0@Slepetys' \
    --to=slepetys@homeworks.com.br \
    --cc=jim@jg555.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.