From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57359)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1YyKX8-0003ko-Hu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:41:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1YyKX4-0006rE-Iv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:41:10 -0400
Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:64772)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <p.fedin@samsung.com>) id 1YyKX4-0006r2-Av
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:41:06 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
	by mailout3.w1.samsung.com
	(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5
	2014)) with ESMTP id <0NP4003K960EKD90@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:41:02 +0100 (BST)
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
References: <011801d0947a$a9e1e8a0$fda5b9e0$@samsung.com>
	<20150529103652.30d30a3d@nial.brq.redhat.com>
	<011d01d099ec$f4f5b7a0$dee126e0$@samsung.com>
	<20150529111858.4b7b0db9@nial.brq.redhat.com>
	<01ab01d09a0a$c1bdb450$45391cf0$@samsung.com>
	<20150529150326.451478f4@nial.brq.redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <20150529150326.451478f4@nial.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:41:01 +0300
Message-id: <020401d09a15$1abda010$5038e030$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-language: ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: 'Igor Mammedov' <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 'Ashok Kumar' <ashoks@broadcom.com>, 'Shlomo Pongratz' <shlomo.pongratz@huawei.com>

 Hello!

> Well KVM side should be fixed instead of driving us along wrong route.

 It can be fixed... Perhaps... If kernel developers acknowledge this is a problem, which
might not happen.
 But still we will have older kernels, and what? Don't you want 64-bit ARM KVM work on
them?

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia