From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rol@as2917.net (Paul Rolland)
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:02 +0000
Subject: [rol@as2917.net: Need help for kernel 2.5.x ???]
Message-Id: <020c01c33b19$ab809de0$5700a8c0@witbe>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20030622185659.GB2380@frodo.local>
In-Reply-To: <20030622185659.GB2380@frodo.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Hello Jean,

> > > This is exactly what I was thinking of, and my question 
> was : which 
> > > basis is the best one : lm_sensors-2.7.0 or some CVS checkout ?
> > 
> > Ah, I don't think anyone has started any cvs code for the 2.5/2.6 
> > version of lmsensors, sorry.  Or does someone who knows the 
> cvs tree 
> > better than I know if this is incorrect?
> 
> No, you're correct (and so is Paul). Libsensors doesn't 
> handle sysfs and doesn't work with 2.5 kernels. Coders are welcome.
> 
> Paul, the version to start from is definitely CVS. 
> 

Thanks very much...
Any specific tag/release or a simple checkout will give me a 
good place where to start with ?

Regards,
Paul