From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541C7C63797 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235930AbjAQHpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 02:45:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235913AbjAQHp3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 02:45:29 -0500 Received: from ex01.ufhost.com (ex01.ufhost.com [61.152.239.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D67EC23DA9; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 23:45:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from EXMBX165.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX165", Issuer "EXMBX165" (not verified)) by ex01.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6D624E208; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) by EXMBX165.cuchost.com (172.16.6.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:23 +0800 Received: from [192.168.125.95] (113.72.144.207) by EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:22 +0800 Message-ID: <02174460-87b8-bb1c-7b6f-39694fa416c3@starfivetech.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:22 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] JH7110 PMU Support Content-Language: en-US To: Conor Dooley CC: , , , Rob Herring , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , References: <20230116074259.22874-1-walker.chen@starfivetech.com> From: Walker Chen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [113.72.144.207] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS061.cuchost.com (172.16.6.21) To EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) X-YovoleRuleAgent: yovoleflag Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 2023/1/17 3:19, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey Walker, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 03:42:56PM +0800, Walker Chen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This patchset adds PMU (Power Management Unit) controller driver for the >> StarFive JH7110 SoC. In order to meet low power requirements, PMU is >> designed for including multiple PM domains that can be used for power >> gating of selected IP blocks for power saving by reduced leakage >> current. The first patch adds device tree binding for PM domain provider >> and consumer. The second patch adds pmu driver and support JH7110 SoC. >> The last patch adds device node about pmu to JH7110 dts. >> >> The series has been tested on the VisionFive 2 boards which equip with >> JH7110 SoC and works normally. > > For the series: > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley > > I'm hoping that someone with knowledge of the power APIs will take a > look now that the driver looks to be in a pretty good state (to my naive > eyes at least). > >> Changes in v3: >> - Rebased on tag v6.1. > > FYI, please pick something more recent than that. > Ideally, the last -rc1, which in this case is v6.2-rc1. OK, the next version will be rebased to the latest kernel. > It's helpful to do this, as when I went to apply your patch, there were > some conflicts that needed to be sorted out. Because of your prerequisite > patches, the usual `b4` commands would not usable. E.g. > > b4 am -3 20230116074259.22874-1-walker.chen@starfivetech.com > Analyzing 4 messages in the thread > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > --- > [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Add starfive,jh7110-pmu > [PATCH v3 2/3] soc: starfive: Add StarFive JH71XX pmu driver > [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: add pmu controller node > --- > Total patches: 3 > Preparing fake-am for v3: JH7110 PMU Support > ERROR: Could not find matching blob for MAINTAINERS (85e8f83161d7) > If you know on which tree this patchset is based, > add it as a remote and perform "git remote update" > in order to fetch the missing objects. > > Fortunately, this is just a driver addition so despite `b4` not > helping it was easy to resolve but for other patches in the future, > this may not be the case. > > Assuming the dt maintainers are happy with the binding, ping me in 2 > weeks if no-one else has commented and I'll apply patches 1 & 2. Could I drop patch 3 and rebase patch 1 & 2 on the latest mainline then submit as v4 ? Best regards, Walker From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 262EBC3DA78 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:46:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=XHfnKR+iHGq2+UQc1nI12hAY9oLEdvIeNkb+vHzTA1E=; b=QPC12CndRXS/Fh QmWpz4MF9wIi4nM4Yh7sXpxZ7ttV7zrZd00gW5FIwzoLUrkD58+wu5TI2ZaYqSFtvbNQ2eSgOip3T fL/WHcBtL57gfaugcztCi4W6mlvHiS/RrQuNd+buGZzgxn/IdHVp/3vCamffsxziC8uVX/7KhBqoy QBH1Acx/xpwdYZqbmUcX8yQnNZIo46JZNUrWT5miFQAcCZhZ7gHzrW2pnisq3JUQdabrkWeB8jpjb UC7ngFmaazrzcHuofJWO+pwQe5YoBiNIKUXGmen7x58j+kxyg4YIcS783hiSxwv0EEt9f1/XpLf6L E3+TtLSEInVli+GeK+JA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pHgfM-00DEkB-Fe; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:45:56 +0000 Received: from ex01.ufhost.com ([61.152.239.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pHgfI-00DEgI-6w for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:45:55 +0000 Received: from EXMBX165.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX165", Issuer "EXMBX165" (not verified)) by ex01.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6D624E208; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) by EXMBX165.cuchost.com (172.16.6.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:23 +0800 Received: from [192.168.125.95] (113.72.144.207) by EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:22 +0800 Message-ID: <02174460-87b8-bb1c-7b6f-39694fa416c3@starfivetech.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:45:22 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] JH7110 PMU Support Content-Language: en-US To: Conor Dooley CC: , , , Rob Herring , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , References: <20230116074259.22874-1-walker.chen@starfivetech.com> From: Walker Chen In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [113.72.144.207] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS061.cuchost.com (172.16.6.21) To EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) X-YovoleRuleAgent: yovoleflag X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230116_234552_601764_F58DAAFE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2023/1/17 3:19, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey Walker, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 03:42:56PM +0800, Walker Chen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This patchset adds PMU (Power Management Unit) controller driver for the >> StarFive JH7110 SoC. In order to meet low power requirements, PMU is >> designed for including multiple PM domains that can be used for power >> gating of selected IP blocks for power saving by reduced leakage >> current. The first patch adds device tree binding for PM domain provider >> and consumer. The second patch adds pmu driver and support JH7110 SoC. >> The last patch adds device node about pmu to JH7110 dts. >> >> The series has been tested on the VisionFive 2 boards which equip with >> JH7110 SoC and works normally. > > For the series: > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley > > I'm hoping that someone with knowledge of the power APIs will take a > look now that the driver looks to be in a pretty good state (to my naive > eyes at least). > >> Changes in v3: >> - Rebased on tag v6.1. > > FYI, please pick something more recent than that. > Ideally, the last -rc1, which in this case is v6.2-rc1. OK, the next version will be rebased to the latest kernel. > It's helpful to do this, as when I went to apply your patch, there were > some conflicts that needed to be sorted out. Because of your prerequisite > patches, the usual `b4` commands would not usable. E.g. > > b4 am -3 20230116074259.22874-1-walker.chen@starfivetech.com > Analyzing 4 messages in the thread > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > --- > [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Add starfive,jh7110-pmu > [PATCH v3 2/3] soc: starfive: Add StarFive JH71XX pmu driver > [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: add pmu controller node > --- > Total patches: 3 > Preparing fake-am for v3: JH7110 PMU Support > ERROR: Could not find matching blob for MAINTAINERS (85e8f83161d7) > If you know on which tree this patchset is based, > add it as a remote and perform "git remote update" > in order to fetch the missing objects. > > Fortunately, this is just a driver addition so despite `b4` not > helping it was easy to resolve but for other patches in the future, > this may not be the case. > > Assuming the dt maintainers are happy with the binding, ping me in 2 > weeks if no-one else has commented and I'll apply patches 1 & 2. Could I drop patch 3 and rebase patch 1 & 2 on the latest mainline then submit as v4 ? Best regards, Walker _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv