From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes-4 for v3.16 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:11:36 +0900 Message-ID: <022101cfa30f$e9fa0fb0$bdee2f10$@samsung.com> References: <53C9AF23.6030007@samsung.com> <53C9B952.6010000@samsung.com> <53C9BF34.2030903@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:49191 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751273AbaGSFLh (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:11:37 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr2.samsung.com (u142.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.142]) by mailout2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N8Y009T813BEO70@mailout2.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:11:35 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Olof Johansson' Cc: arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Tomasz Figa' Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 07/19/14 09:18, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> > >> On 07/19/14 09:12, Olof Johansson wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> This is a regression for v3.16 so please take this in -rc. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Kukjin > >>>> > >>>> The following changes since commit > >>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: > >>>> > >>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) > >>>> > >>>> are available in the git repository at: > >>>> > >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > >>>> tags/samsung-fixes-4 > >>>> > >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 4e3a498d6fc438d8c203c51aadc6ca8fb47b0577: > >>>> > >>>> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix core ID used by platsmp and hotplug code (2014-07-16 > >>>> 02:59:18 +0900) > >>> > >>> > >>> This is based on a newer branch than our current fixes. So I've cherry > >>> picked the patch instead of merged the branch -- if you have the > >>> branch in linux-next you should remove it. > >>> > >> OK, I will. > >> > > BTW, other pm related branches in my tree have dependencies with the change > > so I just reverted that in my -next. > > > > If any problems, please let me know. > > Are they part of the branches you sent now? Is that patch a base in > those branches? > No, I didn't send out any branch including the fix to arm-soc because I also don't want to make any conflict or inconvenience for you :) Just thought, I need to sort it out once it has been merged into mainline. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:11:36 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes-4 for v3.16 In-Reply-To: References: <53C9AF23.6030007@samsung.com> <53C9B952.6010000@samsung.com> <53C9BF34.2030903@samsung.com> Message-ID: <022101cfa30f$e9fa0fb0$bdee2f10$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 07/19/14 09:18, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> > >> On 07/19/14 09:12, Olof Johansson wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> This is a regression for v3.16 so please take this in -rc. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Kukjin > >>>> > >>>> The following changes since commit > >>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: > >>>> > >>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) > >>>> > >>>> are available in the git repository at: > >>>> > >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > >>>> tags/samsung-fixes-4 > >>>> > >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 4e3a498d6fc438d8c203c51aadc6ca8fb47b0577: > >>>> > >>>> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix core ID used by platsmp and hotplug code (2014-07-16 > >>>> 02:59:18 +0900) > >>> > >>> > >>> This is based on a newer branch than our current fixes. So I've cherry > >>> picked the patch instead of merged the branch -- if you have the > >>> branch in linux-next you should remove it. > >>> > >> OK, I will. > >> > > BTW, other pm related branches in my tree have dependencies with the change > > so I just reverted that in my -next. > > > > If any problems, please let me know. > > Are they part of the branches you sent now? Is that patch a base in > those branches? > No, I didn't send out any branch including the fix to arm-soc because I also don't want to make any conflict or inconvenience for you :) Just thought, I need to sort it out once it has been merged into mainline. Thanks, Kukjin