From: "Paul Rolland" <rol@as2917.net>
To: "'Andrey Nekrasov'" <andy@spylog.ru>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <023a01c2def5$ae59a6e0$3f00a8c0@witbe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030227203013.GA25009@an.spylog.com>
Hello,
> Hello Paul Rolland,
>
> > Feb 27 13:50:01 rms-01 Feb 27 13:50:01:30726 kernel: eepro100:
> > wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
> >
> > eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet, 00:06:5B:39:69:2B, IRQ 16.
> > Board assembly 02d484-000, Physical connectors present: RJ45
> > Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
> > General self-test: passed.
> > Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
> > Internal registers self-test: passed.
> > ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
> > Anyone knows why ?
>
> try update bios on motherboard.
> i am use INTEL STL2 and after update bios to last version
> network card work ok
Thanks for the suggestion...
I got another one, telling me to have a look at the e100 driver,
and this raises a question I have for quite a long time : why does
the Kernel have two different supports for the same hardware ?
Is this a migration plan, a long run "please switch from eepro100
to e100" ?
Is there a better working one ?
I don't say that, once a driver exists, no one should ever think
of doing another one, but there are little indication as to which
one people should select...
Quite puzzling ;-)
Regards,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-27 16:56 eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout Paul Rolland
2003-02-27 20:30 ` Andrey Nekrasov
2003-02-28 6:50 ` Paul Rolland [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-28 11:42 Chris Bacott
2003-03-28 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-20 23:31 Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-20 23:51 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-06-21 0:02 ` Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-21 13:46 ` Rafael Martinez
2001-06-22 1:36 ` Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-22 13:31 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-06-22 20:06 ` Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-21 14:19 ` Masaru Kawashima
2001-06-21 14:37 ` John Madden
2001-06-22 1:27 ` Masaru Kawashima
2001-06-21 16:28 ` Masaru Kawashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='023a01c2def5$ae59a6e0$3f00a8c0@witbe' \
--to=rol@as2917.net \
--cc=andy@spylog.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.