From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf alsr: Add missing SIMD handling in aslr_tool__process_sample()
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:42:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <024fd251-a4ba-443f-8aff-f5b1cdb062a3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915091112.333308-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Kindly ping ...
@Arnaldo, @Namhyung, @Ian, not sure if you have bandwidth to review this
small patchset which fixes the Sashiko found minor issues for the "Perf
tools: Support eGPRs/SSP/SIMD registers sampling" patchset?
If possible, it's better to be queued in this cycle, then we don't need
extra backporting. Thanks.
On 9/15/2026 5:11 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Currently the SIMD register sampling is supported, but the corresponding
> handling is missed in aslr_tool__process_sample(). This can break parsing
> of the sample record.
>
> Add the missing SIMD register handling in aslr_tool__process_sample().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> These two patches fix Sashiko reported defects for the patchset:
> "Perf tools: Support eGPRs/SSP/SIMD registers sampling"
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260914014049.2061519-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
>
> tools/perf/util/aslr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/aslr.c b/tools/perf/util/aslr.c
> index 027695d96779..a097084201a0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/aslr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/aslr.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <internal/lib.h> /* page_size */
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/zalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> @@ -992,6 +993,34 @@ static int aslr_tool__process_sample(const struct perf_tool *tool,
> COPY_U64();
> }
> }
> +
> +#define CHECK_SIMD() \
> + do { \
> + if (abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD) { \
> + u64 nr_vector, vec_qwords; \
> + u64 nr_pred, pred_qwords; \
> + u64 header_len, vec_len, pred_len, simd_len; \
> + if (CHECK_BOUNDS(nr + 4, nr + 4)) { \
> + ret = -EFAULT; \
> + goto out_put; \
> + } \
> + header_len = 4; \
> + nr_vector = in_array[i + nr]; \
> + vec_qwords = in_array[i + nr + 1]; \
> + nr_pred = in_array[i + nr + 2]; \
> + pred_qwords = in_array[i + nr + 3]; \
> + if (check_mul_overflow(nr_vector, vec_qwords, &vec_len) || \
> + check_mul_overflow(nr_pred, pred_qwords, &pred_len) || \
> + check_add_overflow(vec_len, pred_len, &simd_len) || \
> + check_add_overflow(header_len, simd_len, &simd_len) || \
> + check_add_overflow(nr, simd_len, &nr) || \
> + nr > max_i - i) { \
> + ret = -EFAULT; \
> + goto out_put; \
> + } \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> if (orig_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
> u64 abi;
>
> @@ -1007,6 +1036,7 @@ static int aslr_tool__process_sample(const struct perf_tool *tool,
> ret = -EFAULT;
> goto out_put;
> }
> + CHECK_SIMD();
> i += nr;
> }
> }
> @@ -1061,6 +1091,7 @@ static int aslr_tool__process_sample(const struct perf_tool *tool,
> ret = -EFAULT;
> goto out_put;
> }
> + CHECK_SIMD();
> i += nr;
> }
> }
>
> base-commit: 91b0782fc9e9d2f0a40b5256146e014802fdbb36
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 9:11 [PATCH 1/2] perf alsr: Add missing SIMD handling in aslr_tool__process_sample() Dapeng Mi
2026-09-15 9:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf util: Explicitly include required headers Dapeng Mi
2026-09-15 9:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 16:23 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-15 9:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf alsr: Add missing SIMD handling in aslr_tool__process_sample() sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 6:42 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-09-21 16:21 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-21 16:22 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-22 0:31 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-22 12:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-22 0:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=024fd251-a4ba-443f-8aff-f5b1cdb062a3@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.