From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:15:28 +0900 Message-ID: <025d01d05cb5$d8c6d650$8a5482f0$@kernel.org> References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <02cd01d057f6$ab1a8e40$014faac0$@kernel.org> <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:14868 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752819AbbCLLPb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:15:31 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr2.samsung.com (u142.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.142]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0NL300D8RJ9TBZB0@mailout1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:15:29 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Eduardo Valentin' , 'Kukjin Kim' Cc: 'Arnd Bergmann' , arm@kernel.org, 'Kevin Hilman' , 'Olof Johansson' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Lukasz Majewski' , 'Marek Szyprowski' Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:16:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > + Eduardo > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know > > > > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for > > > > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for > > > > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > > > > platforms. > > > > > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > > > necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible > > > DT binding change, which you should avoid. > > > > > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for > > 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via thermal tree > > because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for arm-soc, kernel build > > breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get Eduardo's topic branch. > > > Specifically, the developer, while migrating the driver to support DT > and OF thermal, decided to create a header with constants. The header is > used by DT files and the driver code. The header was the dependency. > Yes, sometimes we can't avoid the situation so it can be a kind of dependency... Arnd, Do you have any updates on this? Thanks, Kukjin > > BR, > > Eduardo Valentin > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html > > > > > > For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with "drm/exynos: > > add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its applying then in drm tree. But > > I couldn't send it to arm-soc after that... > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html > > > > > > I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a pull-request, then > > I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of biz. trip to China :( > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html > > > > > > > I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > > > good explanation. > > > > > As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for pull-request but in > > that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry for the inconvenience. > > > > I hope v4.0 can support them properly. > > > > Thanks, > > Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:15:28 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 In-Reply-To: <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <02cd01d057f6$ab1a8e40$014faac0$@kernel.org> <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Message-ID: <025d01d05cb5$d8c6d650$8a5482f0$@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:16:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > + Eduardo > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know > > > > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for > > > > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for > > > > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > > > > platforms. > > > > > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > > > necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible > > > DT binding change, which you should avoid. > > > > > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for > > 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via thermal tree > > because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for arm-soc, kernel build > > breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get Eduardo's topic branch. > > > Specifically, the developer, while migrating the driver to support DT > and OF thermal, decided to create a header with constants. The header is > used by DT files and the driver code. The header was the dependency. > Yes, sometimes we can't avoid the situation so it can be a kind of dependency... Arnd, Do you have any updates on this? Thanks, Kukjin > > BR, > > Eduardo Valentin > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html > > > > > > For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with "drm/exynos: > > add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its applying then in drm tree. But > > I couldn't send it to arm-soc after that... > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html > > > > > > I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a pull-request, then > > I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of biz. trip to China :( > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html > > > > > > > I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > > > good explanation. > > > > > As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for pull-request but in > > that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry for the inconvenience. > > > > I hope v4.0 can support them properly. > > > > Thanks, > > Kukjin