From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:43:03 +0900 Message-ID: <027501d057f1$f13a5090$d3aef1b0$@kernel.org> References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <20154650.hb5Lekq8n0@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:9202 "EHLO mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932636AbbCFJnG (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:43:06 -0500 Received: from epcpsbgr5.samsung.com (u145.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.145]) by mailout4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0NKS00K1AAZSGTE0@mailout4.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:43:04 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Javier Martinez Canillas' , 'Arnd Bergmann' Cc: 'Lukasz Majewski' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, 'Kevin Hilman' , 'Kukjin Kim' , 'Olof Johansson' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Marek Szyprowski' Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > Hello Arnd, > Hi, > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:04:40 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know > >> > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for > >> > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for > >> > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > >> > platforms. > >> > >> What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > >> necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible > >> DT binding change, which you should avoid. > >> > >> I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > >> good explanation. > > > > Even with both fixes-1 and fixes-2 applied, we still get boot failures > > on Exynos: > > > > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/arm-soc/v4.0-rc2-104-g2ee4716/ > > > > Any idea what is going on? > > > > Yes, the problem is the Exynos DRM driver which has a lot of issues. > It's broken if CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_IOMMU is enabled which defaults to > yes after commit 8dcc14f82f06 ("drm/exynos: IOMMU support should not > be selectable by user"). > > I posted a patch to disable IOMMU support on Exynos to avoid these > boot failures and also mentioned to Kukjin that it should be a fix for > 4.0 [0]. But even with IOMMU disabled, the Exynos DRM is broken in > some boards [1] so we may have to disable that driver until everything > gets sorted out and is stable again. > Yes, the fix is in my tree and it will be sent to upstream via arm-soc soon. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:43:03 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 In-Reply-To: References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <20154650.hb5Lekq8n0@wuerfel> Message-ID: <027501d057f1$f13a5090$d3aef1b0$@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > Hello Arnd, > Hi, > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:04:40 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know > >> > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for > >> > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for > >> > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > >> > platforms. > >> > >> What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > >> necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible > >> DT binding change, which you should avoid. > >> > >> I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > >> good explanation. > > > > Even with both fixes-1 and fixes-2 applied, we still get boot failures > > on Exynos: > > > > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/arm-soc/v4.0-rc2-104-g2ee4716/ > > > > Any idea what is going on? > > > > Yes, the problem is the Exynos DRM driver which has a lot of issues. > It's broken if CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_IOMMU is enabled which defaults to > yes after commit 8dcc14f82f06 ("drm/exynos: IOMMU support should not > be selectable by user"). > > I posted a patch to disable IOMMU support on Exynos to avoid these > boot failures and also mentioned to Kukjin that it should be a fix for > 4.0 [0]. But even with IOMMU disabled, the Exynos DRM is broken in > some boards [1] so we may have to disable that driver until everything > gets sorted out and is stable again. > Yes, the fix is in my tree and it will be sent to upstream via arm-soc soon. Thanks, Kukjin