RE: Failures in t9001-send-email

[<rsbecker@nexbridge.com>]

On April 22, 2022 3:57 AM, Alyssa Ross wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 07:19:04PM -0400, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>> On April 21, 2022 6:39 PM, Alyssa Ross wrote:
>> >I thought I'd have a go at a patch, but I wasn't able to get the
>> >tests
>> >running:
>> >
>> >    prove ./t9001-send-email.sh
>> >    ./t9001-send-email.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>> >    Failed 15/188 subtests
>> >      (less 1 skipped subtest: 172 okay)
>> >
>> >    Test Summary Report
>> >    -------------------
>> >    ./t9001-send-email.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 188 Failed: 15)
>> >      Failed tests:  27, 51, 78-84, 123, 147-150, 185
>> >      Non-zero exit status: 1
>> >    Files=1, Tests=188, 17 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr  0.01 sys +
>> > 11.66 cusr
>> 5.37 csys =
>> >17.10 CPU)
>> >    Result: FAIL
>> >
>> >I had a look at the tests to try to guess what was wrong, but I
>> >didn't come
>> up with
>> >anything.  Any ideas?  When I run make test, every other test is
>> >fine, it's
>> just the
>> >send-email tests that are problematic.
>>
>> I have the same issue on NonStop. Not sure why, other than our
>> sendmail is massively broken.
>> --Randall
>
>For me the solution was to make Term::ReadLine available in my development
>environment.  I hope that helps you too!

Thanks. I will look into this.
--Randall