From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Girish" Subject: RE: TWL4030 keypad timeout interrupt Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:27:21 +0530 Message-ID: <028f01c8b5a0$87134140$7f8818ac@ent.ti.com> References: <20080513135417.GL4244@gandalf.research.nokia.com> <3d1886c4eeb5320b5d443df10b6bed87@felipebalbi.com> <023e01c8b580$8242db00$7f8818ac@ent.ti.com> <20080514081629.GA17908@gandalf.research.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:49895 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752903AbYENI6Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 04:58:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080514081629.GA17908@gandalf.research.nokia.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Cc: 'Felipe Balbi' , 'Linux OMAP Mailing List' >-----Original Message----- >From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@nokia.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:46 PM >To: ext Girish >Cc: 'Felipe Balbi'; felipe.balbi@nokia.com; 'Linux OMAP Mailing List' >Subject: Re: TWL4030 keypad timeout interrupt > >Ok, good :-) >thanks > >> >> >So if i read it correctly, we might have 0 set as our timeout. >> > >> >which might explain why we only see the timeout interrupt when >> >releasing the key. >> > >> >Am I right ? >> >> Well, the timeout is here to help the controller come out of >hangs, if any. > >But is it possible that whenever we release a key we get a >timeout? I think something is wrong there. No, it's an empty timeout feature, an interrupt is generated if no key is pressed during that period of time. Regards, Girish