All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: msync() seems not to clean the data cache
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:45:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02a0b963-0057-4292-ba14-642c1647a600@bitwagon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAvjHe6lLkyySN9-@casper.infradead.org>

On 4/25/25 12:31 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:17:37PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>> The system call write() cleans the hardware data cache (writes any dirty
>> values from the data cache into RAM memory) before passing to the VFS
>> the region to be written.  The system call msync() should do likewise.
>> Currently msync() does not clean the hardware data cache, as seen on
>> PowerPC, PowerPC64, and arm64; and probably any CPU that does not
>> have a Write-through cache.  (x86 and x86_64 do have write-through.)
> 
> I think you're right; we don't flush before writeback.  Does this
> fix your problem?
> 
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -2432,6 +2432,7 @@ static bool folio_prepare_writeback(struct address_space *mapping,
>          if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
>                  return false;
> 
> +       flush_dcache_folio(folio);
>          return true;
>   }
> 
> 
It looks promising,  but I got lost tracing the logic by hand, 
especially for my seven $ARCH.  Building and testing will take a while.

The context is UPX support for Enforcing mode of SELinux, as outlined:
    fd = memfd_create("upx", MFD_EXEC);
    ftruncate(fd, length);
    maddr = mmap(0, length, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    decompress(maddr, length, compressed_input);
    msync(maddr, length);   // fd was losing random data here
    munmap(maddr, length);  // paranoia over VMA "hangover"
    maddr2 = mmap(maddr, length, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,
       MAP_SHARED|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
See bug report at  https://github.com/upx/upx/issues/907 .
Meanwhile explicit user-mode cache cleaning (using $ARCH-dependent
system call, or hand code, or heuristics) is necessary because of
the inertia of many many installed Linux instances.



      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-25 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-25 19:17 msync() seems not to clean the data cache John Reiser
2025-04-25 19:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-25 20:45   ` John Reiser [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02a0b963-0057-4292-ba14-642c1647a600@bitwagon.com \
    --to=jreiser@bitwagon.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.