From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:33:41 -0800 Message-ID: <02ae01cdef69$67d66200$37832600$@samsung.com> References: <003301cde30b$c584c2d0$508e4870$%cho@samsung.com> <032401cde783$485ae1a0$d910a4e0$@samsung.com> <20130110171844.GA2650@8bytes.org> <027601cdef61$2df576a0$89e063e0$@samsung.com> <20130110191207.GI25591@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20130110191207.GI25591-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Content-language: en-us List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: 'Joerg Roedel' Cc: 'Linux Samsung SOC' , 'Hyunwoong Kim' , 'Prathyush' , 'Subash Patel' , 'Linux Kernel' , 'Linux IOMMU' , 'Cho KyongHo' , 'Linux ARM Kernel' , 'Rahul Sharma' List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org 'Joerg Roedel' wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:34:48AM -0800, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Hmm, I think, just one [7/12] patch does matter so if you could create topic > > branch and apply [7/12] patch firstly before other drivers/ changes would > be > > better to me. It's OK on both trees if I just _merge_ the first [7/12] > > commit in the topic branch you provided for exynos-iommu. But you know, > you > > don't have to rebase it once I merge it in Samsung tree. > > > > How about? > > Sounds good. Should I take the patch directly from this post? I would > add your Acked-by then and make it the base for the arm/exynos branch. Sure, keep going on with Acked-by: Kukjin Kim > Once the branch is set-up, as usual it will not be rebased. OK, good. Let me know the name of branch when you set-up it :-) Thanks. - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:33:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v6 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT In-Reply-To: <20130110191207.GI25591@8bytes.org> References: <003301cde30b$c584c2d0$508e4870$%cho@samsung.com> <032401cde783$485ae1a0$d910a4e0$@samsung.com> <20130110171844.GA2650@8bytes.org> <027601cdef61$2df576a0$89e063e0$@samsung.com> <20130110191207.GI25591@8bytes.org> Message-ID: <02ae01cdef69$67d66200$37832600$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org 'Joerg Roedel' wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:34:48AM -0800, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Hmm, I think, just one [7/12] patch does matter so if you could create topic > > branch and apply [7/12] patch firstly before other drivers/ changes would > be > > better to me. It's OK on both trees if I just _merge_ the first [7/12] > > commit in the topic branch you provided for exynos-iommu. But you know, > you > > don't have to rebase it once I merge it in Samsung tree. > > > > How about? > > Sounds good. Should I take the patch directly from this post? I would > add your Acked-by then and make it the base for the arm/exynos branch. Sure, keep going on with Acked-by: Kukjin Kim > Once the branch is set-up, as usual it will not be rebased. OK, good. Let me know the name of branch when you set-up it :-) Thanks. - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755697Ab3AJTd7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:33:59 -0500 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:12142 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753999Ab3AJTd6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:33:58 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfee61b-b7f616d00000319b-40-50ef17a4c707 From: Kukjin Kim To: "'Joerg Roedel'" Cc: "'Cho KyongHo'" , "'Linux ARM Kernel'" , "'Linux IOMMU'" , "'Linux Kernel'" , "'Linux Samsung SOC'" , "'Hyunwoong Kim'" , "'Prathyush'" , "'Rahul Sharma'" , "'Subash Patel'" References: <003301cde30b$c584c2d0$508e4870$%cho@samsung.com> <032401cde783$485ae1a0$d910a4e0$@samsung.com> <20130110171844.GA2650@8bytes.org> <027601cdef61$2df576a0$89e063e0$@samsung.com> <20130110191207.GI25591@8bytes.org> In-reply-to: <20130110191207.GI25591@8bytes.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:33:41 -0800 Message-id: <02ae01cdef69$67d66200$37832600$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQFIekVXHKw0ow7bnqULS98EzrZJiAHrktOYAWxAehQBVbax7gIWEG/nmRe/PGA= Content-language: en-us DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t8zY90l4u8DDKbvFbe4vGsOm8WM8/uY HJg8Pm+SC2CM4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mr4/nMHe8E3toolh7ezNDAuY+1i5OSQEDCR2Lf8CJQt JnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBZYwS319tZocpWr+2gRUisYhRYkvnb6iqv4wSD7pmMoNUsQloSBx+/wys Q0RARaLl3A+wOLPALmaJqeckIBpeMEp8nTORCSTBKWAg0XXjGthuYYFEidUXdoLFWQRUJQ48 Wc0IYvMKWEoc+PqDCcIWlPgx+R4LxFAtifU7jzNB2PISm9e8ZYY4VUFix9nXjBBH+Eks+DKH HaJGXGLSg4fsEPMFJL5NPgQ0hwOoXlZi0wFmkNskBJaxS3y63M4IMUdS4uCKGywTGCVmIVk9 C8nqWUhWz0KyYgEjyypG0dSC5ILipPRcI73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkEiT3sG4qsHiEKMAB6MS D6+W77sAIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8LQuAQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxh9gC6fyCwlmpwPTAJ5 JfGGxsYmZiamJuaWpuamOISVxHkZTz0JEBJITyxJzU5NLUgtghnHxMEp1cBonZ86gf/wD/63 345djdDt9lTQmf9oTuqaD9cDf2u9n3RmOstVZtkLe+77FE78G2PwZYkw6zrd8kU/3Kq3tfFK b5XYlWuXqxuxZYVQxsIcpeYjuaHuxgd/2Ewo3q0Sf+ntjiUuq4N2zi5rZ/667iSbPMOmi/d/ nyh8ee1Gp9pbH0eVuSkdO49nKrEUZyQaajEXFScCAAdAOFrhAgAA X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrLIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAd0l4u8DDD79FrK4vGsOm8WM8/uY HJg8Pm+SC2CMamC0yUhNTEktUkjNS85PycxLt1XyDo53jjc1MzDUNbS0MFdSyEvMTbVVcvEJ 0HXLzAEaraRQlphTChQKSCwuVtK3wzQhNMRN1wKmMULXNyQIrsfIAA0krGPM+P5zB3vBN7aK JYe3szQwLmPtYuTkkBAwkVi/tgHKFpO4cG89WxcjF4eQwCJGiS2dv6Gcv4wSD7pmMoNUsQlo SBx+/4wdxBYRUJFoOfcDLM4ssItZYuo5CYiGF4wSX+dMZAJJcAoYSHTduAa2QlggUWL1hZ1g cRYBVYkDT1Yzgti8ApYSB77+YIKwBSV+TL7HAjFUS2L9zuNMELa8xOY1b5khTlWQ2HH2NSPE EX4SC77MYYeoEZeY9OAh+wRGoVlIRs1CMmoWklGzkLQsYGRZxSiaWpBcUJyUnmukV5yYW1ya l66XnJ+7iREcx8+kdzCuarA4xCjAwajEw6vl+y5AiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkghvywKgEG9KYmVV alF+fFFpTmrxIUYfoE8nMkuJJucDU0xeSbyhsYmZkaWRmYWRibk5DmElcV7GU08ChATSE0tS s1NTC1KLYMYxcXBKNTDqtSfZ/vkuJd8787KdCR/XnU0zt609vqxirsu75bwnGoQnKm1cIpDo FHfyZE/wzPdx/+ZcFJt7a7PbppP8mo/Kyg7/+xW8cMPV5bumhZ1axcd4kv1qql99za/O3/dm y1V075rSsu1aYsReA9mUJhHG6SnaTd+mnXmw1i74VVzU/QUJKfs7uefFKLEUZyQaajEXFScC AP/RMNQQAwAA X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 'Joerg Roedel' wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:34:48AM -0800, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Hmm, I think, just one [7/12] patch does matter so if you could create topic > > branch and apply [7/12] patch firstly before other drivers/ changes would > be > > better to me. It's OK on both trees if I just _merge_ the first [7/12] > > commit in the topic branch you provided for exynos-iommu. But you know, > you > > don't have to rebase it once I merge it in Samsung tree. > > > > How about? > > Sounds good. Should I take the patch directly from this post? I would > add your Acked-by then and make it the base for the arm/exynos branch. Sure, keep going on with Acked-by: Kukjin Kim > Once the branch is set-up, as usual it will not be rebased. OK, good. Let me know the name of branch when you set-up it :-) Thanks. - Kukjin