[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] pci: Support parsing PCI controller DT subnodes

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

On 08/30/2018 03:32 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:07 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/29/2018 05:15 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>> +Simon
>>>
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:22 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/24/2018 08:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> The PCI controller can have DT subnodes describing extra properties
>>>>> of particular PCI devices, ie. a PHY attached to an EHCI controller
>>>>> on a PCI bus. This patch parses those DT subnodes and assigns a node
>>>>> to the PCI device instance, so that the driver can extract details
>>>>> from that node and ie. configure the PHY using the PHY subsystem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
>>>>
>>>> Well, bump ?
>>>>
>>>> This is the only missing patch to get my hardware working properly.
>>>
>>> I don't think we ever had an agreement on the v1 patch. Simon had a
>>> long email that pointed out what Linux does seems like a 'fallback' to
>>> find a node with no compatible string.
>>>
>>> Back to this, if we have to go with this way, please create a test
>>> case to cover this scenario.
>>
>> The fact that it works on a particular board is not tested enough?
>> Do we need a custom, special, synthetic test ?
>>
> 
> I believe that's always been the requirement against the DM code
> changes. I was requested in the past when I changed something in the
> DM and I see other people were asked to do so. Like Alex said, it does
> not mean this patch was not tested enough, but to ensure future
> commits won't break this.

So, do you have any suggestion how to implement this test ? It seems
Alex posed the same question. It doesn't seem to be trivial in the
context of sandbox.

>> Anyway, any feedback on the patch ? Did you test it ? I again only see
>> "do this random stuff and that random stuff" , but zero actual feedback.
>>
> 
> If "this and that random stuff" means test case I asked for, please
> check my proposal on the v1 patch thread which indicated that a proper
> test case should be created. You seems to have missed that.

So, any feedback on this actual patch ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut