From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 5/5] Samsung Exynos MCPM support for 3.16 Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:19:14 +0900 Message-ID: <02fe01cf75af$a9a89cc0$fcf9d640$@samsung.com> References: <014801cf73c8$7d1f9930$775ecb90$@samsung.com> <20140522053841.GI32618@quad.lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:50809 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbaEVLTQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 07:19:16 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr5.samsung.com (u145.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.145]) by mailout3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N5Z00C4L3G29390@mailout3.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:19:14 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20140522053841.GI32618@quad.lixom.net> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Olof Johansson' Cc: arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , 'Kevin Hilman' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Abhilash Kesavan' Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:11:54AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > The following changes since commit > d7067f1c5fa0232001502569c6878d22308da268: > > > > devicetree: bindings: document SYSRAM binding (2014-05-15 03:30:29 > +0900) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > > tags/exynos-mcpm > > > > for you to fetch changes up to ccf5511797cd4b48d20a85fa1778f5608eac9fd7: > > > > ARM: EXYNOS: Add MCPM call-back functions (2014-05-16 04:26:30 +0900) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Exynos MCPM support for v3.16 > > > > - adding MCPM backend support for SMP secondary boot and core switching > > on Samsung's Exynos5420. > > > > Tested on exynos5420-smdk5420 and exynos5420 based chromebook (peach-pit) > > using the "/dev/b.L_switcher" user interface. Secondary core boot-up has > > also been tested on both the boards. > > This goes with new SoC enablement as well; we'll merge it after multi- > platform. > Well, the branch (tags/exynos-mcpm) is for exynos5420 and as you know, it is not new SoC? I think. But it's up to you. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:19:14 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 5/5] Samsung Exynos MCPM support for 3.16 In-Reply-To: <20140522053841.GI32618@quad.lixom.net> References: <014801cf73c8$7d1f9930$775ecb90$@samsung.com> <20140522053841.GI32618@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <02fe01cf75af$a9a89cc0$fcf9d640$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:11:54AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > The following changes since commit > d7067f1c5fa0232001502569c6878d22308da268: > > > > devicetree: bindings: document SYSRAM binding (2014-05-15 03:30:29 > +0900) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > > tags/exynos-mcpm > > > > for you to fetch changes up to ccf5511797cd4b48d20a85fa1778f5608eac9fd7: > > > > ARM: EXYNOS: Add MCPM call-back functions (2014-05-16 04:26:30 +0900) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Exynos MCPM support for v3.16 > > > > - adding MCPM backend support for SMP secondary boot and core switching > > on Samsung's Exynos5420. > > > > Tested on exynos5420-smdk5420 and exynos5420 based chromebook (peach-pit) > > using the "/dev/b.L_switcher" user interface. Secondary core boot-up has > > also been tested on both the boards. > > This goes with new SoC enablement as well; we'll merge it after multi- > platform. > Well, the branch (tags/exynos-mcpm) is for exynos5420 and as you know, it is not new SoC? I think. But it's up to you. Thanks, Kukjin