From: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
To: Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com>,
netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: load balance problem
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:38:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <030501c2c2b6$ae7c18c0$13fcc5cb@Housecall> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1043301815.2968.5.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com
Hi
The one it installs with Redhat RPM of IPROUTE
is borken AFAIK, better get lastest tar and install
i had same problem, after installing the new Iproute, the routes works
fine
hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Wittenberg" <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: load balance problem
> I've been trying to test the load balancing in our lab and it doesn't
> appear to be working. I have a RH 8.0 firewall, which appears to have
> all the specified options set in the kernel .config. I am running a
> sniffer on both out-going links, and only ever see traffic go down one
> or the other, never both. It's always the one I list first:
>
> ip route add default scope global equalize \
> nexthop via 172.27.3.3 dev eth1 weight 1 onlink \
> nexthop via 172.27.1.1 dev eth0 weight 1 onlink
>
> What looks weird is the output:
> # /sbin/ip route list
> 172.27.15.0/24 dev eth2 scope link
> 172.27.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.27.1.200
> 172.27.3.0/24 dev eth1 scope link
> 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
> default equalize
> nexthop via 172.27.3.3 dev eth1 weight 1 dead onlink pervasive
> nexthop via 172.27.1.1 dev eth0 weight 1 onlink
>
> The 172.27.3 and .1 are both the external links, but I haven't found an
> explanation for what "dead" and "pervasive" are. I also don't see those
> showing up in any of the examples I've seen. So any clues why this only
> goes out the first link? I first thought kernel or default gateway, but
> made sure the original default gateway was not specified, and the kernel
> appears to be correct. Something else I've obviously missed?
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-23 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 6:03 load balance problem Daniel Wittenberg
2003-01-23 8:08 ` hare ram [this message]
2003-01-23 11:52 ` How to Stop scanings hare ram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='030501c2c2b6$ae7c18c0$13fcc5cb@Housecall' \
--to=hareram@sol.net.in \
--cc=daniel-wittenberg@starken.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.