diff for duplicates of <033101d49246$00d1c320$02754960$@opengridcomputing.com> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index eea3875..c09c619 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,15 +1,9 @@ "ref\020181211233652.9705-1-sagi@grimberg.me\0" "ref\002a201d49239$0b00f3f0$2102dbd0$@opengridcomputing.com\0" "ref\0bd50927c-c72b-01f6-bad7-080076610cde@grimberg.me\0" - "From\0Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>\0" - "Subject\0RE: [PATCH RFC 0/4] restore polling to nvme-rdma\0" + "From\0swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH RFC 0/4] restore polling to nvme-rdma\0" "Date\0Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:10:45 -0600\0" - "To\0'Sagi Grimberg' <sagi@grimberg.me>" - " <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>\0" - "Cc\0<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>" - <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org> - 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@lst.de> - " 'Keith Busch' <keith.busch@intel.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "> > Hey Sagi,\n" @@ -37,4 +31,4 @@ "\n" "I didn't look in detail at your changes, but ib_change_cq_ctx() is called by the application, right? I was just asking what if the semantics of the call were \"change the context when it is safe to do so\" vs \"do it immediately and hope there are no outstanding WRs\". But I don't think this semantic change simplifies the problem." -231733cb4935f168d7c3c8e2da380f9b94c40f3bf8338a838fdf3bee3531f4bc +52e164a37a108d4c0dc4c00f2705f7850155d2c70e290935413cefbed9c99513
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.