From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:43:22 +0900 Message-ID: <033301cf9764$032390e0$096ab2a0$@samsung.com> References: <1404163947-3105-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <53B4494B.1030909@samsung.com> <53B48BCB.4010308@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:12764 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754301AbaGDInY (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 04:43:24 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgr2.samsung.com (u142.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.142]) by mailout3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N8600AANIWB1XD0@mailout3.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:43:23 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Sachin Kamat' Cc: 'Tomasz Figa' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'linux-samsung-soc' Sachin Kamat wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kukjin, > >> > > Hi, > > > > > >> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >>> > >>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > >>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > >>> it will be done with using device tree. > >>> > >>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs > >>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes > >>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes > >>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 > >>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes > >>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd > >>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and > >>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC > >>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes > >>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes > >>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes > >>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC > >>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata > >>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes > >>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and > >>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes > >>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes > >> > >> > >> Thanks for this series. > >> > >> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series > >> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing. > >> > > Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just > > now but it should be fine with your series I think. > > > > Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch. > > Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week? > You mean whole patches in this series? OK, I will in this weekend. Note, as you know, missing patches in my tree are handled by other maintainer. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:43:22 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline In-Reply-To: References: <1404163947-3105-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <53B4494B.1030909@samsung.com> <53B48BCB.4010308@samsung.com> Message-ID: <033301cf9764$032390e0$096ab2a0$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Sachin Kamat wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kukjin, > >> > > Hi, > > > > > >> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >>> > >>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > >>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > >>> it will be done with using device tree. > >>> > >>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs > >>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes > >>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes > >>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 > >>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes > >>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd > >>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and > >>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC > >>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes > >>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes > >>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes > >>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC > >>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata > >>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes > >>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and > >>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes > >>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes > >> > >> > >> Thanks for this series. > >> > >> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series > >> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing. > >> > > Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just > > now but it should be fine with your series I think. > > > > Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch. > > Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week? > You mean whole patches in this series? OK, I will in this weekend. Note, as you know, missing patches in my tree are handled by other maintainer. Thanks, Kukjin