Re: [PATCH net-next] vsock/test: fix vsock_ioctl_int() check for unsupported ioctl

[Xuewei Niu <niuxuewei.nxw@antgroup.com>]

On 2025/7/15 17:32, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> 
> `vsock_do_ioctl` returns -ENOIOCTLCMD if an ioctl support is not
> implemented, like for SIOCINQ before commit f7c722659275 ("vsock: Add
> support for SIOCINQ ioctl"). In net/socket.c, -ENOIOCTLCMD is re-mapped
> to -ENOTTY for the user space. So, our test suite, without that commit
> applied, is failing in this way:
> 
>     34 - SOCK_STREAM ioctl(SIOCINQ) functionality...ioctl(21531): Inappropriate ioctl for device
> 
> Return false in vsock_ioctl_int() to skip the test in this case as well,
> instead of failing.
> 
> Fixes: 53548d6bffac ("test/vsock: Add retry mechanism to ioctl wrapper")
> Cc: niuxuewei.nxw@antgroup.com
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> index 1e65c5abd85b..7b861a8e997a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ bool vsock_ioctl_int(int fd, unsigned long op, int expected)
>  	do {
>  		ret = ioctl(fd, op, &actual);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> -			if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP)
> +			if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP || errno == ENOTTY)
>  				break;
>  
>  			perror(name);

LGTM, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Xuewei Niu <niuxuewei.nxw@antgroup.com>