From: "Brandon Broyles" <netfilter@drbroyles.com>
To: fabrice@netfilter.org, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ?
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 00:53:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <038e01c2937d$cece8030$4545450a@drbroyles.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200211241243.59265.fabrice@netfilter.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fabrice MARIE" <fabrice@netfilter.org>
To: <netfilter@drbroyles.com>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ?
> There is a problem though (fixed in the CVS, but not yet updated on the
HTML page..)
> you shouldn't run # make patch-o-matic, but instead from the patch-o-matic
directory,
> you should run the ./runme script with the patch suite you want to apply
as a parameter.
> The corrected SGML source of the document is there :
>
http://cvs.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/netfilter/documentation/H
OWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO.sgml
From what I read in the above link, I think something may be wrong with my
patch-o-matic I got via CVS. I ran a (./runme base) and I got the following
output. In this output the only thing that is "Already applied:" is the
first line. Nothing else seems to be applied after that. Plus, that link
above references switches ( Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?] )
that I am not getting.
*********************************************************************
Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
Almost every one has bugs, so I don't recommend applying them all!
-------------------------------------------------------
Already applied: submitted/2.4.18
submitted/ahesp-static
submitted/arptables
submitted/config-cleanup
submitted/conntrack?helper-unregister
submitted/conntrack
submitted/dscp
submitted/DSCP
submitted/ecn
submitted/ECN
submitted/helper
submitted/ip6tables-export-symbols
submitted/ip6tables-exthdr-bug-ipv6
submitted/ip_conntrack_protocol_destroy
submitted/ip_conntrack_protocol_unregister
submitted/ip_nat_irc-srcaddr-fix
submitted/ipt_MIRROR-ttl
submitted/ipt_REJECT-checkentry
submitted/ipt_unclean-ecn
submitted/ipv6-agr-ipv6
submitted/irc-dcc-mask
submitted/length-ipv6
submitted/local-nat
submitted/log-tunnel-fix-ipv6
submitted/macro-trailing-semicolon-fix
submitted/mangle5hooks
submitted/nat-export_symbols
submitted/nat-memoryleak-fix
submitted/netfilter-arp
submitted/ownercmd
submitted/pkttype
submitted/REJECT-dont_fragment
submitted/REJECT_mark
submitted/remove_no_version
submitted/skb_clone_copy
submitted/TOS-oops-fix
submitted/ulog-module-unload
submitted/ulog-nlgroup-shift-fix
submitted/ulog-sparc-bitops-fix
submitted/unclean-udpchecksum
submitted/z-newnat16
submitted/z-newnat_assertfix
submitted/z-newnat_changeexpect-lockfix
pending/newnat-udp-helper
base/ahesp6-ipv6
base/frag6-ipv6
base/fuzzy
base/iplimit
base/ipt_unclean-ubit
base/ipv4options
base/IPV4OPTSSTRIP
base/ipv6header-ipv6
base/mport
base/NETLINK
base/NETMAP
base/nth
base/opts6-ipv6
base/pool
base/psd
base/quota
base/random
base/realm
base/REJECT-ipv6
base/route6-ipv6
base/SAME
base/time
base/TTL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No more patches to apply! Q to Quit or ? for options [Q/a/r/b/?]
Excellent! Kernel is now ready for compilation.
*********************************************************************
I never get a chance to choose which patches I wish to install. Before I
wrote that first message to this mail list, I had already tried recompiling
the kernel and iptables after I ran (./runme base). Does it look like my
patch-o-matic is working incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brandon Broyles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-24 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-23 16:34 Am I making a bone-headed mistake with patch-o-matic ? netfilter
2002-11-24 4:43 ` Fabrice MARIE
2002-11-24 5:40 ` electrode
2002-11-24 5:53 ` Brandon Broyles [this message]
2002-11-24 17:32 ` Is there something wrong with patch-o-matic? Brandon Broyles
2002-11-24 17:45 ` Alexandros Papadopoulos
2002-11-24 18:10 ` electrode
2002-11-28 2:24 ` Fabrice MARIE
2002-11-28 3:14 ` Brandon Broyles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='038e01c2937d$cece8030$4545450a@drbroyles.com' \
--to=netfilter@drbroyles.com \
--cc=fabrice@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.