From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:33:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039901c88954$fecd1350$050514ac@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200803182104.58917.sr@denx.de
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> > Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
>> >
>> > Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
>> > specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot
>> > custodian branches for those architectures. Fortunately we had some
>> > volunteers. Here the list:
>> >
>> > u-boot-at91 (Atmel ARM) Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>> > u-boot-pxa (XScale) Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>> > u-boot-s3c24xx (Samsung ARM) Harald Welte
>> >
>> > Again, thanks a lot to the (new) custodians. Your help is really
>> > appreciated.
>>
>> Would it not be better if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91
>> Product line
>
> Could be, I really don't know. I don't remember seeing Atmel ARM patches
> posted or reviewed by other Atmel than yourself.
They were sent in 3-4 years ago.
Since there were no response, they lost interest, and have not tried since then.
They are maintaining a separate U-Boot source package.
>
> So for the time being, we gladly accept that Jean-Christophe volunteered to
> take over this custodianship. From my point of view, he is doing a very good
> job with his other U-Boot activities. So I expect that the AT91 support could
> be handled better from now on.
Have no criticism against Jean-Christophe, but I think that support for
new chips may be available earlier with the AT91 team.
>
> But again, we are open for other suggestions here too. If you think someone at
> Atmel is better suited to do this job, then please let us know.
I will not have the time to maintain, that is for sure.
I think that the issue needs to be raised with the AT91 team, but it might be that
the AT91 team decides that they rather work closely with Jean-Christophe.
Andrew Victor is doing a good job maintaining the AT91 Linux port
so there is a precedent for this already.
>
> BTW: If somebody else feels suited to take over some open custodianships (PCI,
> RTC, HWMON come to my mind right now), please let us know too. :)
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-18 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-18 5:07 [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change Stefan Roese
2008-03-18 10:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-18 14:55 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-18 20:04 ` Stefan Roese
2008-03-18 23:33 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2008-03-19 5:00 ` Stefan Roese
2008-03-19 7:41 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-20 17:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-03-20 18:13 ` Stelian Pop
2008-03-21 10:38 ` Stefan Roese
2008-03-25 23:05 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-20 17:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-03-26 10:14 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='039901c88954$fecd1350$050514ac@atmel.com' \
--to=ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.