From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "krv" Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 04:11:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] tc [htb] performance on 2000 leaves Message-Id: <03cf01c42b42$e12b1730$2800a8c0@jupiter> List-Id: References: <20040425102304.83613.qmail@web41602.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040425102304.83613.qmail@web41602.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Feri adam" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 3:53 PM Subject: [LARTC] tc [htb] performance on 2000 leaves > Hi > > I'm going to setup a linux box as a packet shaper for > my company. we've got at most 2000 leaves and about 4 > to 5 different parent calsses. > i'm just wondering if someone can tell me how much > will be the delay ?! > what is the prefered hardware solution for best > performance with tc in this scenario?! > and about setting up the linux box in bridged mode; i > googled and found out that this has a bad impact on tc > performance ! does anybody has any experience around > this issue ?! > benchmarks are so welcome in any case; since i've > searched internet but i haven't found any useful ones > ! Have a look at this http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.adv-filter.hashing.html It might help you out. KRV _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/