From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4CADDDFE for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:04:07 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <32F3CC26D4DAC44E8ECD07155727A46E816A58@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net> References: <32F3CC26D4DAC44E8ECD07155727A46E816A58@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <044bc5d89a68ac70c37f1796fb4547c1@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:04:43 +0100 To: "Zhu Ebony-r57400" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> * Why isn't there any handling of SPEFloatingPointRound exceptions? > > I think the SPEFloatingPointRound exception is not necessary to handle > if we > handle floating point exception this way. Some more explanation than "I don't think so" would be nice ;-) Segher