From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261414AbUL2UFh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:05:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261416AbUL2UFh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:05:37 -0500 Received: from dns.toxicfilms.tv ([150.254.37.24]:65471 "EHLO dns.toxicfilms.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261414AbUL2UFc (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:05:32 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv via dns X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.23 (Clear:RC:0(213.238.103.71):. Processed in 0.067998 secs) Message-ID: <04ef01c4ede2$ff4a7cc0$0e25fe0a@pysiak> From: "Maciej Soltysiak" To: References: <41CD51E6.1070105@kolivas.org> Subject: Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Con wrote: > Only the staircase scheduler currently has an implementation of > sched_batch and you need 2 more patches on top of the staircase patch > for it to work. Hmm, Is it feasable to write a sched_batch policy for the current linux schedulers? I mean, if there are people that want it bad, maybe it would be nice to be able to use a version of sched_batch that would work without the staircase scheduler. It is still experimental, right? Regards, Maciej