From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:56:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0530bfa657901d5b47f0a645cb1f220c502a8da2.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkTA4NYJckE+4eLF2ucrK8h6iDipAt-ynCsVXWYfrOAQSRzhw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2026-05-28 at 09:25 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 9:00 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > On Wed, 2026-05-27 at 22:37 -0400, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Here's the latest -stable bumps for OEcore and yocto-bsps (again,
> > > let me know if the combined pull causes issues).
> > >
> > > I've also moved the dev kernel to v7.1 and fixed lttng-modules
> > > along the way. Hopefully a new point release will be available soon
> > > and we can quickly drop the backported patches.
> > >
> > > Also note that since ross removed the CVE exclusions .inc file in
> > > a patch (which I think is still pending), I haven't updated the
> > > exclusions for the kernel in this series.
> >
> > Thanks for these. I put them in for testing and there are two weird failures:
> >
> > qemuarm64 musl python3 ptest:
> >
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/109/builds/460
> >
> > which leads to:
> >
> > https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20260528-74/testresults/qemuarm64-musl-ptest/python3.log
> >
> > test_tracemalloc_track_race (test.test_tracemalloc.TestCAPI.test_tracemalloc_track_race) ... Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault
> >
> > qemux86-64 musl libc-test ptest failure:
> >
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/110/builds/444
> >
> > which failed in functional_ipc_shm
> >
> > https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20260528-74/testresults/qemux86-64-musl-ptest/libc-test.log
> >
> > FAIL src/functional/ipc_shm.exe [status 1]
> >
> > --- ptest result ---
> > FAIL: functional_ipc_shm
> >
> >
> > I'll rerun the tests, it is possible this is some weird intermittent
> > issue, I just can't tell :(
> >
>
>
> ack'd. I also took another look at the changelogs and don't see anything that looks obvious or makes
> me think it isn't a race.
>
> test_tracemalloc_track_race segfault (qemuarm64-musl)
> - v6.18.32 → .33 has 55 mm/kernel commits, including 1dcd36420af2 futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD
> requirement for private default hash alloc and several sched/fair tweaks that affect timing
>
> That could nudge a race test toward a fail, if the test was flaky before.
>
> functional_ipc_shm (qemux86-64-musl libc-test)
> - No ipc/ changes in v6.18.32 → .33. Kernel-side SysV shm code is untouched.
> - A quick search found me a few hits on.libc-test's ipc_shm has what looks like known intermittent
> issues in some emulated arch + c library combox
>
> I can try a bisect between .32 and .33 if we get it to happen again, I'll get setup for testing in case
> it does fail again or becomes a common intermittent issue.
They didn't happen on the second build so it looks like intermittent
failures and that should unblock these patches. Given the bug Yoann
referenced, and the ones you've found about shm, I'm thinking we should
get more strict about disabling flaky tests...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 2:37 [PATCH 0/7] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta][PATCH 01/07] linux-yocto/6.18: update to v6.18.32 bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta][PATCH 02/07] linux-yocto/6.18: qat/intel configuration warning fixes bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta][PATCH 03/07] linux-yocto-dev: bump to v7.1 bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta][PATCH 04/07] lttng-modules: fix build against kernel 7.1+ bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta][PATCH 05/07] linux-yocto/6.18: update to v6.18.33 bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:46 ` Patchtest results for " patchtest
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH 06/07] yocto-bsps: update to v6.18.31 bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:46 ` Patchtest results for " patchtest
2026-05-28 2:37 ` [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH 07/07] yocto-bsps: update to v6.18.33 bruce.ashfield
2026-05-28 2:46 ` Patchtest results for " patchtest
2026-05-28 13:00 ` [PATCH 0/7] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request Richard Purdie
2026-05-28 13:25 ` Bruce Ashfield
2026-05-28 13:31 ` [OE-core] " Yoann Congal
2026-05-28 13:56 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-06 15:23 bruce.ashfield
2026-01-07 12:53 ` Kevin Hao
2026-01-07 13:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2023-12-21 14:25 bruce.ashfield
2023-12-05 4:26 bruce.ashfield
2022-06-07 13:59 bruce.ashfield
2020-10-06 19:04 Bruce Ashfield
2018-05-18 15:05 Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-27 15:03 Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-28 10:31 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-28 10:33 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-28 12:01 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-28 12:07 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-28 12:57 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-29 12:58 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-29 13:13 ` Richard Purdie
2018-03-29 13:55 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-11-22 15:58 Bruce Ashfield
2015-05-21 19:08 Bruce Ashfield
2014-09-23 14:57 Bruce Ashfield
2014-09-08 19:55 [PATCH 0/7] linux-yocto*: " Bruce Ashfield
2014-09-09 11:42 ` Burton, Ross
2014-09-09 12:55 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0530bfa657901d5b47f0a645cb1f220c502a8da2.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.