From: "Raz Amir" <razamir22-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "'Bruce Richardson'"
<bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:07:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <053901d0565a$ac8c36e0$05a4a4a0$@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150303133246.GB11084@bricha3-MOBL3>
Thank you.
See answers inline (mostly ack, but not only), and I will send the updated
patch soon.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 03 March 2015 15:33
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-
> probe during driver unload
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and
> > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir < <mailto:razamir22-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
razamir22-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson < <mailto:bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >
> > #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> >
> > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES 128
> > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static
> > +int last_detached = 0;
> Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of
> "last_detached".
Ack.
>
> >
> > struct nic_uio_softc {
> > device_t dev_t;
> > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> > if (dev != NULL)
>
> We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so maybe
flip
> this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we can
dedent
> everything below that follows it.
>
Ack.
> > for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES;
i++)
> > if
(pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> &&
> > -
pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev)
> > +
pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev) {
> > +
if (last_detached+1 <
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> I don't think you need the +1 here.
It is needed, otherwise the last object will be added at
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES position while the last position is
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1.
However, I did change the code to:
if (last_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1) {
to better reflect that.
You will see it in the next patch I will send.
>
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> > +
> detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> > +
}
> > +
else {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d.
> dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
> > +
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> > +
}
> DPDK coding style is not to put braces around single-line statements like
this.
Ack.
>
>
> > +
> Remove whitespace from this new line.
>
Ack.
> >
device_detach(dev);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > nic_uio_unload(void)
> > {
> > + int i;
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to
device_probe_and_attach
> for dev=%p...\n",
> > + detached_devices[i]);
> > + device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > --
> > 2.1.2
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 6:33 [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
[not found] ` <1424932400-66862-1-git-send-email-razamir22-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <20150301134818.GA31578-0o1r3XBGOEbbgkc5XkKeNuvMHUBZFtU3YPYVAmT7z5s@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-01 14:21 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-01 17:16 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <20150301171646.GA32246-0o1r3XBGOEbbgkc5XkKeNuvMHUBZFtU3YPYVAmT7z5s@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-02 8:18 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 11:36 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <20150302113654.GA20329-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-02 11:58 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-03 11:30 ` Raz Amir
[not found] ` <EF8D26D5-4997-4F99-86B3-BF59DA25187D-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-03 11:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-03 12:56 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 9:07 ` Raz Amir [this message]
2015-03-04 10:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 10:28 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:15 ` [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
[not found] ` <1425467754-2693-1-git-send-email-razamir22-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-09 8:07 ` Raz Amir
[not found] ` <84B1AA3E-21E4-4A41-ADEE-B37E27147243-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-09 10:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-10 8:15 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v4] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
[not found] ` <1425572663-22299-1-git-send-email-razamir22-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-11 10:26 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-12 12:24 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-16 16:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 22:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='053901d0565a$ac8c36e0$05a4a4a0$@gmail.com' \
--to=razamir22-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.